हिंदी

Godhra Train Burning Case: SC To Hear Pleas Of State Govt, Convicts On April 10

The Supreme Court recently stated that it will dispose of the bail pleas of several convicts serving life imprisonment in the 2002 Godhra train burning case on April 10.

A bench comprising of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala took note of the submissions of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Gujarat government, that he has to verify certain factual details with regard to some convicts.

Therefore, the bench considered the submissions of the law officer and adjourned the hearing to April 10, and said it will “dispose of” the pending bail pleas of the convicts on that day.

Meanwhile, the bench extended the bail granted to one of the convicts earlier on the ground that his wife was suffering from cancer. The law officer while supporting the extension of bail stated that “His wife is suffering from cancer. My consent may be recorded.”

Earlier on March 17, the top court said it will hear on March 24 the appeal of the Gujarat government and the bail pleas of several accused in the case.

On February 20, the state government told the top court that it will be seeking the award of the death penalty to 11 convicts whose sentences in the 2002 Godhra train burning case were commuted to life imprisonment by the Gujarat High Court.

The solicitor general stated that “We will be seriously pressing for the award of the death penalty to the convicts whose death penalties were commuted into life imprisonment (by the Gujarat High Court). This is the rarest of rare cases where 59 people, including women and children, were burnt alive. It is consistent everywhere that the bogie (coach) was locked from the outside. 59 died, including ladies & children.”

Giving details, the law officer said that 11 convicts were sentenced to death by a trial court and 20 others were granted life terms in the case.

Mehta said that the high court upheld a total of 31 convictions in the case and commuted the death penalties of the 11 convicts to life term.

On February 27, 2002, 59 people were killed when the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express that was burnt at Gujarat’s Godhra, triggering riots in the state.

Mehta stated that the state government has come in appeal against the commutation of the death penalty into a life term for 11 convicts. Several accused, he added, have filed pleas against the high court upholding their convictions in the case.

The top court granted bail to 2 convicts in the case so far. 7 other bail pleas are pending adjudication in the matter.

The bench noted that a large number of bail applications have been filed before it in the case and said, “It has been agreed that the AORs (advocates-on-record) on behalf of applicants along with advocate Swati Ghildiyal, standing counsel for Gujarat, shall prepare a comprehensive chart with all relevant details. List after three weeks.”

The Supreme Court on January 30 sought the Gujarat government’s response on the bail pleas of some of the convicts sentenced to life imprisonment in the case.

Therefore, the court issued notice to the state government on the bail pleas of Abdul Rahman Dhantia alias Kankatto and Abdul Sattar Ibrahim Gaddi Asla, among others.

On the other hand, the state government said it was not “merely a stone pelting” case as the convicts had bolted a coach of the Sabarmati Express, leading to the death of several passengers on the train.

Furthermore, the solicitor general said “Some are saying their role was just stone pelting. But when you lock a bogey from outside, light it on fire and then pelt stones, it is not just stone pelting.” On December 15, last year, the top court granted bail to Faruk, who was serving a life sentence in the case, and noted that he had been in jail for 17 years.

Faruk, along with several others, was convicted for pelting stones at a coach of the train.

Recommended For You

About the Author: Meera Verma

Judge Recommends Sending Terror Case Against Engineer Rashid To MP/MLA Court Bombay HC Imposes Rs.25,000 Cost On Nashik Prison Jailor Kerala HC Orders Probe Into Minister Cherian’s Remarks “State Can’t Apply Different Standards for Accused”: SC Delhi Court Rejects Lakshay Vij’s Bail Plea In Money Laundering Case