In the last piece where I started a conversation on a civilizational approach to “blasphemy” in the context of Section 295A of the IPC, I had ended the piece with the following questions: “How does one determine the indigeneity of thought? Does this translate to recognition of the concept of terroir of a certain thought…
Annual Membership Membership Required
You must be a Annual Membership member to access this content.
Already a member? Log in here
