The Supreme Court has taken a firm stance against the unofficial ban on Kamal Haasan’s film Thug Life in Karnataka, issuing a notice to the state government while expressing serious concerns over the suppression of constitutional rights.
A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan highlighted the state’s apparent failure to uphold the law in the face of violent threats by fringe groups.
Constitutional Rights Under Threat
The petition highlights how Karnataka’s inaction has violated:
- Article 19(1)(a): Freedom of expression for filmmakers
Article 19(1)(g): Right of exhibitors to conduct business
Article 21: Safety concerns for theater staff and audiences
Violent Threats Replace Legal Process
Alarmingly, the court documents reveal that threats of arson and violence have effectively replaced due process, with the Karnataka Film Chambers of Commerce imposing an extralegal ban. Despite clear instances of incitement to violence, authorities have failed to take appropriate legal action against those making public threats.
The producers’ earlier plea before the Karnataka High Court yielded no relief, with the court reportedly suggesting “compromise with perpetrators” rather than enforcing the law. This judicial reluctance forced the Supreme Court’s intervention.
Historical Tensions Resurface
The controversy stems from Kamal Haasan’s alleged remarks about Kannada’s linguistic origins, with groups demanding an apology. The petition warns of a potential repeat of 1991 anti-Tamil violence if threats aren’t curbed.
Urgent Relief Sought
Petitioners have requested: immediate police protection for willing theaters, filing of FIRs against those issuing violent threats, and Restraint on KFCC from enforcing unofficial bans.
Court’s upcoming hearing will test the resilience of constitutional principles against regional cultural sensitivities in India’s federal framework.
The court has scheduled the matter for further hearing next Tuesday, setting the stage for a significant examination of state responsibility in protecting fundamental rights against mob pressure.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International
