Ashish Sinha, Author at Legally Speaking - Page 59 of 70

हिंदी

Author: Ashish Sinha

Bihar Hooch Tragedy

NHRC to Investigate Bihar Hooch Tragedy by its own Team as Death Toll Raises

Ashish Sinha — December 17, 2022 comments off

The National Human Rights Commission( NHRC) on Saturday has decided to depute its own investigation team headed by one of it’s Members for an on the spot enquiry about more deaths in... Read more »

Samrat Chakraborty, NIA

NIA Files Charge Sheet Against CPI (Maoist) Cadre in Guwahati Court Under UAPA

Ashish Sinha — December 17, 2022 comments off

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Saturday has filed a supplementary charge sheet against accused Samrat Chakraborty in connection with the arrests of two leaders of the banned CPI (Maoist) group before... Read more »

Kashivishwanath

Gyanvapi: ‘By passing act, UP govt has given ownership of Temple complex to the Hindus’

Ashish Sinha — December 17, 2022 comments off

Appearing for Hindu side Advocate Vishnu shankar Jain on Friday told Allahabad High Court that under Article 254(2) of the law made by the Center and the State regarding the concurrent list,... Read more »

Shraddha Walkar murder case

Shraddha Murder Case: Aftab Eats his words, says never prayer for Bail

Ashish Sinha — December 17, 2022 comments off

Notorious Killer of Shraddha walker states before court that he signed the vakalatnama but not prayer for Bail in this case. After Aftab Statement Saket Court Differs the date for 22 December... Read more »

shraddha Murder case

Shraddha Murder Case: Delhi’s Saket court to hear bail plea filed by Aftab Poonawala

Ashish Sinha — December 17, 2022 comments off

On Friday Aftab Puna accused of Murder of Live in Partner Shraddha, has Filed Bail plea in Saket District Court. As information are Coming Police has got Aftab Poonawal’s CFSL Reports and... Read more »

Nitish kumar

Bihar Booz Scam: NHRC Issues Notice to Nitish Government

Ashish Sinha — December 16, 2022 comments off

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on Friday has taken suo motu cognizance of the media reports that several people have died after allegedly consuming spurious liquor in Saran district of Bihar.... Read more »

shraddha Murder case

Shraddha Murder Case: Accused Aftab Moves for Bail in Saket Court

Ashish Sinha — December 16, 2022 comments off

Aftab Puna accused of Murder of Live in Partner Shraddha, to day Filed Bail Appeal in Saket District Court, But Court keep it Pending till Saturday. As information are Coming Police has... Read more »

Allahabad HC

Alld HC Sentences 43 Policemen to 7 years Rigorous Jail in Case of Culpable Homicide

Ashish Sinha — December 16, 2022 comments off

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has held 43 policemen guilty under IPC 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) in the 1991 an alleged encounter of 10 Sikhs by... Read more »

maulna badruddin azmal

Lok Sabha MP Maulna Badruddin Azmal in Hot Water, Kamrup Court issues order to Lodge FIR

Ashish Sinha — December 16, 2022 comments off

A court in Assam’s Kamrup metropolitan district Court has ordered the Guwahati police to register an FIR against Lok Sabha MP Badruddin Ajmal, for his controversial remarks. The court was hearing a... Read more »

The Allahabad High Court will hear Gyanvapi masjid management’s revision petition challenging a Varanasi court order on the maintainability of a petition against the demand for regular worship of 'Shringar Gauri' at 3.30 pm today. Appearing for Hindu side Advocate Vishnu shankar Jain on Thursday told Allahabad High Court that the demolition of the temple does not end its existence.That place will always be considered as a temple because the place of the deity never changes. On Wednesday, Senior advocate Harishankar Jain and Vishnu Jain argued on behalf of the Hindu side. The counsel for the Hindu side claimed in the court that the entire Gyanvapi complex belongs to the Vishwanath temple area. In the Din Mohammad case, only prayers were allowed under the domes. Ownership was not given. Vishnu shankar Jain also told the Allahabad high court that the case was not barred by the Waqf Act as Aurangzeb had never declared it a Waqf property. On December 8, Hari Shankar Jain, the counsel representing the Hindu side in a Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque case, had submitted an old map of the Vishweshwar temple to the Allahabad High Court. Hari Shankar Jain, the counsel representing the Hindu side in a Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque case, claimed in the Allahabad High Court that The existence of a temple on the disputed site in Varanasi and its demolition to build a mosque is mentioned in religious and history books. Hari Shankar Jain also argued that the Vishweshwar temple map was made by the then District Magistrate James prinsep in British times 1836. He also explained about map. He also submitted plan of the old Vishweshwar temple. Hari Shankar Jain also explained about old Vishweshwar temple. where there are three domes and Shringar Gauri, Ganesh and Dandapani Mandap, the idol was established there, which was being worshipped. It was closed in 1993 whereas, before this regular worship of Shringar Gauri continued, Jain reiterated the old history of the temple in his argument. On December 5, Hindu side advocate Harishankar Jain argued that the Shivling in Kashi was established by Lord Shiva himself, that is why it is called Swayambhu. It is also described in the Kashi section. The Hindus has been worshiping Shringar Gauri since before 1947. He has only demanded the right of worship, which does not violate any legal right of the petitioner. In Islamic law, worship on other's property is not accepted. Vishnu Shankar Jain also drew the attention of the court towards the mythological facts and the decisions of the court. Said, there is a detailed description of it in Adhyay 99 and 100 of Skanda Purana, Shloka numbers 61 to 70. It has been proved in this order that the Vishweshwar Nath temple was damaged during the time of Muhammad Ghori and Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. The court adjourned the hearing of the case till Tuesday. On 30 November, the Gyanvapi mosque management committee concluded its argument on its plea challenging a Varanasi court order on the maintainability of the case filed by five Hindu women who sought permission to offer regular prayers to idols of deities in the mosque compound. Earlier, Senior advocate SFA Naqvi, argued that the Waqf Act and the Places of Worship Act of 1991 were mainly cited by the arrangement committee of the mosque. The arrangements committee of Gyanvapi Masjid has made Rakhi Singh as well as 10 people, including the five plaintiff women and the UP government, parties in this case. The mosque's arrangement committee has filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court against the verdict of the Varanasi district in which the court had rejecting the objection of the Muslim side. The Varanasi district court had on September 12 dismissed a plea by the mosque committee Anjuman Intezamia Masjid (AIM) which challenged the maintainability of the suit filed by the five Hindu plaintiffs. A total of five petitions related to the Gyanvapi dispute of Varanasi are filed in the Allahabad High Court. Last year, five women, including Rakhi Singh, had filed a petition in the district court of Varanasi, seeking permission for regular worship of Shringar Gauri in the Gyanvapi campus.

Gyanvapi: Namaz Can be Offer only Under the Domes, But Campus Belongs to Hindus only

Ashish Sinha — December 16, 2022 comments off

The Allahabad High Court will hear Gyanvapi masjid management’s revision petition challenging a Varanasi court order on the maintainability of a petition against the demand for regular worship of ‘Shringar Gauri’ at 3.30 pm today... Read more »