- -

‘MUGHAL MOSQUE’ SITUATED WITHIN QUTUB COMPLEX A PROTECTED MONUMENT, CENTRE TELLS DELHI HC IN PLEA ALLEGING STOPPING OF PRAYERS

The Delhi High Court in the case Managing Committee Of Delhi Waqf Board v. Union Of India & Ors. Observed…

2 years ago

When prosecution itself is infested with motive, court can quash and interfere in the same to prevent abuse of process of law: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court in the case Jaisankar v. The State and another observed, while quashing a final report against…

2 years ago

JOINT OWNER CAN’T PREVENT ANOTHER CO-OWNER FROM USING PORTION OF JOINT PROPERTY BY INJUNCTION EXCEPT TO PREVENT WASTAGE/DESTRUCTION: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

The Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case Tarsem Singh (deceased) through his LR versus Major Singh (deceased) through…

2 years ago

CESTAT ALLOWS CENVAT CREDIT OF 2% CVD PAID ON IMPORT OF STEAM COAL

The Delhi High Court in the case Commissioner of Central Excise And Customs, Central Goods And Service Tax Versus M/s…

2 years ago

Reopening assessment without furnishing information violates principles of natural justice: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court in the case Maharaja Edifice Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors, the bench comprising…

2 years ago

Tax payment software has to be tailor-made according to the legal rights of the taxpayers: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court in the case Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Versus Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 73-1 observed…

2 years ago

SEEKING RESPONSE OF DG PRISONS ON MEASURES TO MAINTAIN DISCIPLINE AMONG INMATES, OBVIATE INCIDENTS OF VIOLENCE: DELHI HIGH COURT

The Delhi High Court in the case Sameer Through His Parokar Faizan Anwar v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi…

2 years ago

Generally, wife’s convenience must be looked at while considering transfer petition under Section 24 CPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court in the case NCV Aishwarya vs AS Saravana Karthik Sha observed that generally it is the wife’s…

2 years ago

GUJARAT HIGH COURT: REFUSED TO INTERFERE FOR ORDER FOR DEPORTATION OF PAKISTAN NATIONAL; ARTICLE 19(1)(E) NOT AVAILABLE TO FOREIGNERS

The Gujarat High Court in the case Akhil Valibhai Piplodwala (Lokhandwala) v/s District Superintendent Of Police, Panchamahal At Godhra observed…

2 years ago

DELHI HIGH COURT: IN TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT SUIT OVER ‘HELL’ ENERGY DRINK; AWARDS RS 30 LAKH DAMAGES TO HUNGARIAN COMPANY

The Delhi High Court in the case Hell Energy Magyarorszag KFT v. Shri Brahm Shakti Prince Beverages Pvt Ltd &…

2 years ago