हिंदी

‘BONAFIDE REQUIREMENT’ OF SUIT PREMISES NOT STATUTORY MANDATE FOR EVICTION U/S 12(2) OF CHHATTISGARH RENT CONTROL ACT, 2011: HIGH COURT

The Chhattisgarh High Court recently in the case Shri Gaushala Pinjarapol v. Ashok Kumar Kochar and Anr observed and stated that the ‘bonafide requirement’ of suit premises is not a statutory stipulation... Read more »

Issuance of multiple notices by investigating authority does not falter preliminary inquiry: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court in the case M.Prakash v. The Superintendent Of Police observed and has said that issuance of multiple notices by the investigating agency to a person while carrying out... Read more »

Madras High Court Grants Conditional Bail To Stunt Master Kanal Kannan: “It Has Become A Fashion To Make Such Comments”

On Thursday, the Madras High Court in the case V Kannan v State observed and has granted conditional bail to Hindu Munnani office bearer and stunt master Kanal Kannan for his remarks,... Read more »

J&K&L HIGH COURT: SUMMONING ACCUSED IN A CRIMINAL MATTER IS A SERIOUS BUSINESS, SHOULD NOT BE DONE MECHANICALLY

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court recently in the case Bharti Airtel Limited Company & Ors v Malik Mushtaq observed that the summoning of an accused in a criminal matter... Read more »

High Court Stayed Demolition Action Citing Ganesh Chaturthi Celebrations In Mumbai

The Bombay High Court in the case Deepak Vithal Adhav & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors observed and has granted interim protection to slum dwellers against demolition orders issued by... Read more »

Delhi High Court: Urgent Interim Relief In IPR Cases Extremely Important To Protect Interest Of Parties As Well As Consumers

The Delhi High Court in the case Bolt Technology OU v. Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Anr observed that urgent interim relief including at ex-parte and ad-interim stage is extremely important in... Read more »

DELHI HIGH COURT APPOINTS FIVE RETIRED JUDICIAL OFFICERS AS PRESIDING OFFICERS OF SPECIAL COURTS

The five retired Judicial Officers are appointed by the Delhi High Court as Presiding Officers of Special Courts Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 established in compliance of Supreme Court’s directions in “in Re:... Read more »

SECOND APPEAL DOES NOT ABATE ON DEATH OF ONE RESPONDENT WHEN RIGHT TO SUE SURVIVES AGAINST SURVIVING RESPONDENT: SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court in the case Sakharam (D) vs Kishanrao observed that a second appeal does not abate on death of one of the respondents when the right against the surviving respondent... Read more »

Delhi High Court grants interim injunction in favour of ‘USHA’ sewing machines in trademark infringement suit

The Delhi High Court in the case Usha International Limited v. Mr. Haseen Ahmed Trading As Tusha Sewing Machine Co observed and has granted ad interim injunction in favour of famous sewing... Read more »

CREDITOR ENTITLED TO CLAIM FROM SUCCESSFUL RESOLUTION IF ITS SUIT IS DECREED, OBSERVES NCLAT DELHI

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the case Goltens India Pvt. Ltd. v Sudip Bhattacharya, the bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Justice N Satyanarayana Murthy (Judicial Member) and... Read more »