Other Courts

GUJARAT HIGH COURT DIRECTS ALL JUDICIAL OFFICERS TO STRICTLY OBSERVE COURT’S WORKING HOURS

The Gujarat High Court has directed all judicial officers in the state to maintain strict observance of court working hours…

2 years ago

Calcutta High Court calls for vigil to prevent noise pollution, keeping sound level within permissible limit

The Calcutta High Court in the case Tarunmoy Modak v. The State of West Bengal & Or’s observed and has…

2 years ago

CRIMINAL TRESPASS COMPLAINT CAN’T BE MADE IF PROPERTY IS NOT IN POSSESSION OF COMPLAINANT: KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

The Karnataka High Court in the case Shivaswamy & Others v. The State Of Karnataka & Anr observed and held…

2 years ago

A REPORT UNDER SECTION 99 OF IBC CANNOT BE FILED BY RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL WITHOUT ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY’S DIRECTIONS: NCLT MUMBAI

The Mumbai Bench, National Company Law Tribunal in the case Bank of Baroda Limited v Mr. Pawan V Kikavat, the…

2 years ago

SECTION 354 OF IPC NOT ATTRACTED IF A WOMAN DIDN’T PERCEIVE ACT OF ‘CATCHING HOLD OF HER HAND’ AS INVADING HER DECENCY: TELANGANA HC

The Telangana High Court in the case K.Rattaiah @ Ratnaji v. The State of Andhra Pradesh observed that if a…

2 years ago

CESTAT sets aside demand for service tax on ocean freight charges

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the case M/s. Geodis Overseas Private…

2 years ago

MARRIED WOMEN WILFULLY COHABITING WITH ANOTHER MAN CAN’T PROSECUTE HIM FOR RAPE UNDER FALSE PROMISE OF MARRIAGE: TELANGANA HIGH COURT

The Telangana High Court in the case The State of Telangana versus Dasari Murali observed and has made it clear…

2 years ago

‘SEPARATE ENACTMENT: A BAIL ACT’ TO STREAMLINE GRANT OF BAIL

“The Union of India may consider the introduction of a separate enactment in nature of a bail Act, so as…

2 years ago

Madras High Court rejects plea by ex-CM Paneerselvam, refuses to stall AIADMK general council meetings

The Madras High Court in the case O. Paneerselvam v. AIADMK and others observed and refused to interfere with the…

2 years ago

IO WHO MERELY COLLECTED DOCUMENTS CAN’T BE CROSS-EXAMINED WITH REGARD TO ITS CONTENTS UNDER SECTION 139 OF EVIDENCE ACT: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

The Punjab And Haryana High Court in the case Rakesh Jain v. Central Bureau of Investigation observed and has recently…

2 years ago