The Gujarat High Court in the case Ahmedabad Sunni Muslim Waqf Committee v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation observed and has directed the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation for deciding a representation made by the Ahmedabad... Read more »
Although the targeted killing of Kashmiri Pandits over the past few months has evoked anger in civil society, it manifests the deep societal divide between the communities in the predominantly Muslim Kashmir... Read more »
The Supreme Court in the case Delhi Jal Board vs Nirmala Devi observed and stated that the qualification prevailing on the date of applying for compassionate appointment is to be considered and... Read more »
The National Company Law Tribunal in the case ICICI Bank v. M/s Tripati Inks Ltd, the principal bench comprising of Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and Mr. Avinash Srivastava expressed it displeasure upon the... Read more »
The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to entertain a plea challenging the order for a complete ban on firecrackers in the NCT of Delhi till 1st January 2023, noting that similar... Read more »
The Supreme Court on Thursday denied a petition by BJP MP Manoj Tiwari that asked for an expedited hearing on a case that challenged the Delhi government’s complete ban on firecrackers. “Let... Read more »
In response to petitions filed by the state government and one of the complainants, the Kerala High Court on Thursday revoked the anticipatory bail given to author and social activist Civic Chandran... Read more »
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) in the case RMY Industries v Apple Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Technical Member, Dr. Alok Srivastava and... Read more »
The Supreme Court in the case Slp(Crl) No. 9572/2022 Ii-C Union Territory Of J And K Versus Waheed Ur Rehman Parra observed and has dismissed filed by the Union Territory of Jammu... Read more »
The Supreme Court in the case BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. vs Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission observed and has held that it is not permissible to amend the tariff order made under Section... Read more »