Identity politics, elections and the Representation of the People Act, 1951
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="32px" width="32px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
In 2017, a seven-Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Abhiram Singh vs C.D. Commachen (Dead) By Lrs.& Ors delivered a judgement on Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The limited issue which the Supreme Court was called upon to decide was whether the language of Section 123(3)…
Recent Posts
Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment
Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…
ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment
In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…
“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath
Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…
Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC
The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…
“Blackest Day In Indian Judicial System”: Allahabad HC Bar Association Criticises Transfer Of Justice Varma
The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has strongly opposed the transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma…
2018 Rape Case: Punjab Court Helds ‘Yeshu Yeshu Pastor’ Bajinder Singh Guilty
In a significant development, the POCSO Court in Mohali has found Pastor Bajinder Singh, a…