‘Let the Collegium function according his duties’ Apex Court take a Dig on few of Retired Judges

The Collegium System is most Transparent and functioning well. Let us perform our duties and let the collegium function according to his duties too. The Supreme Court bench was hearing a petition by Bhardwaj against a Delhi High Court order, which dismissed her plea seeking apex court collegium’s agenda in connection with a meeting held on December 12, 2018 when certain decisions were purportedly taken on the elevation of some judges to the apex court.

Taking a dig at retired judges, the Supreme Court said that it has become a fashion for them to comment on the earlier decisions taken by the collegium, adding that the existing collegium system should not be derailed on the basis of statements of “some busybody”.

The apex court emphasised that collegium is the most transparent institution.A bench headed by Justice M.R. Shah said, “Let the system, which is functioning well, not be derailed. The collegium does not work on the basis of some busybody.”

The bench, also comprising Justice C.T. Ravikumar, added, “Let us perform our duties and let the collegium function according to its duties. We are the most transparent institution.”

Of late, friction points have been created between the Centre and the judiciary over the collegium system, under which judges appoint judges to constitutional courts.

The bench said it does not want to comment on what a few former apex court judges, who were once members of the Supreme Court Collegium, are now saying about the mechanism.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing petitioner and RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj, said that Justice Madan Lokur, former apex court judge, who was part of the Supreme Court Collegium in 2018, had said that one of the decisions should have been uploaded on the Supreme Court website.

The bench said, “Nowadays, it has become a fashion to comment upon earlier decisions (of the collegium) made when they (former judges) were part of the collegium.”

It added, “We don’t want to say anything on their comments.”

The collegium, which was headed by then CJI Ranjan Gogoi and comprised four senior-most judges, Justices Lokur, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde and N.V. Ramana, took certain decisions regarding the appointment of judges. Howeverthe were not uploaded on the SC website. In January 2019, the collegium revisited the decisions “in the light of additional materials”.

Legally Speaking Desk

Share
Published by
Legally Speaking Desk

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago