When the ASI’s report revealed that the demolished temple’s pillars were used for the construction of the disputed structure in the 1500s, the new argument that was set up was that of ‘architectural reuse’, i.e. it was contended that the temple was not demolished to build the disputed structure in its place, instead it was merely an established practice to use the debris of pre-existing religious structures to construct new places of worship.
The Delhi High Court on Friday has directed Sir Ganga Ram Hospital to release the…
The Delhi High Court was assured by city authorities on Friday that the installation of…
The Delhi High Court on Friday requested responses from the Centre and the Central Board…
The Supreme Court issued a stern warning to Gujarat authorities on Friday regarding demolition activities…
The Delhi High Court on Friday disposed of the 3rd plea concerning Sonam Wangchuk's detention…
The Supreme Court on Friday has directed the Assam State Legal Services Authority to conduct…