When the ASI’s report revealed that the demolished temple’s pillars were used for the construction of the disputed structure in the 1500s, the new argument that was set up was that of ‘architectural reuse’, i.e. it was contended that the temple was not demolished to build the disputed structure in its place, instead it was merely an established practice to use the debris of pre-existing religious structures to construct new places of worship.
A court in Latur, Maharashtra, on Wednesday remanded Dr. Pramod Ghuge, accused of murdering a…
The Archaeological Survey of India has informed the Supreme Court that two structures within the…
A Delhi court has declined to take cognizance of a charge sheet filed by the…
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday has instructed the city government to expedite the process…
An MP-MLA court has denied the anticipatory bail plea of former MP Kadir Rana and…
The Madras High Court has issued notices to the National Medical Council and the Tamil…