Categories: Criminal Law

Satish Ragde vs State of Maharashtra: Misconceived interpretation of Section 7 of the POCSO Act contrary to the legislative intent

As a matter of intellectual exercise, even before delving into the judicial exposition on the subject, it would be prudent to understand the mind of the legislature in relation to the legislative intent behind Section 7 which is to be read in consonance with the scheme of the Act. The foremost duty of the judge, while interpreting any provision of a statute, is to give effect to the intent of the legislature as long as it not ultra vires the constitutional provisions and contrary to the public good and principle.

This content is for Annual Membership members only.
Login Join Now
Legally Speaking Desk

Share
Published by
Legally Speaking Desk

Recent Posts

Delhi HC Confutes BSNL’s Decision To Rescind Contract With IT Company

The Delhi High Court has recently annulled BSNL’s decision to cancel a purchase order it…

23 minutes ago

“Delhi’s Illegal Hotel Borewell Sealing Drive To Continue”: Authorities Informs NGT

Authorities in Delhi have on Saturday informed the National Green Tribunal that the operation to…

46 minutes ago

India Inaugurates First Constitution Museum At O.P. Jindal Global University

India on November 23, 2024 has celebrated the inauguration of its first Constitution Museum at…

1 hour ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Case: Delhi Court Summons 2 Former Police Officials

The Rouse Avenue Court on Saturday summoned 2 former police officials, Dharam Chandrasekar and Ravi…

2 hours ago

Cal HC Impedes WB Govt From Selling Immovable Properties In KMC

The Calcutta High Court has recently restrained the West Bengal government from selling, transferring, or…

2 hours ago

SC Grants Partial Relief To CPS Against Himachal Pradesh HC’s Disqualification

The Supreme Court of India has recently offered partial relief in the legal battle surrounding…

2 hours ago