Satyendra Jain’s lawyer did not appear in Delhi court, hearing postponed for 10 days

Tihar jail authority on Saturday filed a medical report of Delhi government minister Satyendar Jain before Rouse Avenue Court. However hearing of the case was postponed due to non-availability of Satyendar Jain’s lawyer. Now the next hearing of the case will be held on December 12.

Earlier Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court had asked jail authority to file the medical report of Satyendar Jain.

On 30 November Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court had dismissed the application of Satyendra Jain seeking direction to provide him with special foods like dry fruits for his religious beliefs in Tihar Jail Barrack.
Dismissing the application, the court of Special Judge Vikas Dhull said that Jain was being extended preferential treatment by jail officials by providing him fruits and vegetables, which violates the jail rules and Article 14 of the constitution. As per the jail rules, inmates can be served only regular meals prepared in jails, but they can purchase other items like fruits and vegetables from jail canteen.
The court further said that the government cannot provide special privileges to anyone, and it is also noted by the court that according to Tihar Jail record shows that Satyendar Jain didn’t purchase any fruit and vegetable from the jail canteen during the period August 20 to October 10, except on one occasion. And as per the court there was no official order to provide fruits and vegetables to the Satyendar Jain, therefore it was violation of rules.
Further the court said that, in the above context that “This court prima facie believes that the fruits/vegetables were being provided without there being any order of DG Prison or any authority, to the applicant in violation of the DPR 2018, by the staff of Tihar Jail no.7, where the applicant was lodged. The providing of fruits and vegetables to the applicant was in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, 1950 as State is bound to treat all the prisoners equally and there can be no discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, sex, religion, status etc. Article 14 of the Constitution of India, 1950 provides for Equality before Law, which basically means that all persons should be treated equally no matter whether they are poor or rich, male or female, upper caste or lower caste,”.
The court said that the Satyendra Jain started to purchase the fruits and vegetables after 26 officials of Jail No.7 were transferred and the Superintendent of Jail No.7 was suspended.

Legally Speaking Desk

Recent Posts

Shambhu Border Protest: SC Expresses Concern Over Dallewal’s Health, Says Top Court’s Doors Always Open For Farmers

The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed concern over the health of farmers' leader Dallewal and…

8 hours ago

Delhi HC To Hear Raghav Chadha’s Petition Against Bungalow Eviction On Dec 19

The Delhi High Court will hear AAP MP Raghav Chadha’s plea on December 19, where…

8 hours ago

“Court Open To Farmers’ Suggestions After Rejection Of Punjab Govt Committee”: SC

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stated that its doors were “always open” to the demands…

9 hours ago

Delhi HC Orders Virtual Appearance Of 2 Accused In MCOCA Case Involving Naresh Balyan

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the virtual presence of Rohit and Sachin Chikara,…

10 hours ago

Delhi HC Issues Notice To ED On Leena Paulose’s Bail Plea

The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to the ED regarding the bail application…

10 hours ago

Supreme Court Grants Co-Accused Time To Respond In Yasin Malik Trial Transfer Case

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted 2 weeks to the co-accused in the Yasin Malik…

12 hours ago