Mundaka Fire Case: Delhi HC Directs Trial Court To Decide Bail Plea Of Owner Of The Building Expeditiously

The Delhi High Court today directed the trial court to decide expeditiously the bail plea of Manish Lakra, the building owner in the Mundaka fire case in which 27 people were killed that broke out in May last year.

Justice Yogesh Khanna directed the trial court to decide the default bail plea of Manish Lakra in view of the order passed by the coordinate bench.
The bench headed by Justice Amit Mahajan granted default bail to Harish and Varun Goyal in the matter.

Their plea seeks default bail, over non-filing of the charge sheet in 60 days that was dismissed by the sessions court. They challenged the order before the High court.

However, the default bail plea of Manish Lakra is pending before the sessions court and listed on March 17.

Advocate Pradeep Kumar Arya apprised the bench that the two co-accused have been granted default bail by the High court. However, the plea is pending before the session court.

The High court on February 3, issued a notice to the Delhi police and directed them to file a reply.

Accused Manish Lakra challenged the order of the trial court denying him regular bail in the matter. His bail plea was rejected last month.
Advocate Pradeep Kumar Arya submitted that this is a case of section 304 A (Death due to negligent act) of IPC. Despite this, the Delhi police have invoked section 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).

He argued & referred to the case of Union Carbide in which 1000 people died. Finally, the supreme court held that it was a case of section 304 A of IPC only.

Earlier he moved a revision petition challenging an order denial default to him by the trial court.

The petitioner moved an application seeking bail over the non-filing of a charge sheet in the case. His plea was dismissed by the Magistrate Court on August 6, 2022.

This case pertains to a fire incident in the Mundaka area on May 13 in which 27 people were killed. An FIR was registered on May 14, 2022, under sections 308/304/120B/34 IPC, at Police Station, Mundka.

Therefore, the petitioner was arrested on May 15, 2022, and was produced before the court the next day. Thereafter he was sent to judicial custody. In these circumstances the petitioner is under police custody since May 15, 2022, i.e. around 80 days, the petition stated.

The magistrate court granted bail to the wife Sunita Lakra and mother Sushila Lakra. They were summoned by the court after taking cognizance of the charge sheet. They were named as accused in the charge sheet but had not been arrested during the investigation.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

9 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

9 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

10 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

11 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

11 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

12 hours ago