Delhi High Court

2020 Delhi Riots: Court Asks ED To File Submissions Backing Claim Of Tahir Hussain’s Plea For Nixing PMLA Case Not Maintainable

The Delhi High Court on Monday has asked ED to make written submissions to back its contention that former AAP leader Tahir Hussain’s plea seeking quashing of a money laundering case against him in connection with the 2020 northeast Delhi riots wasn’t maintainable.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma passed the order after ED’s counsel questioned the maintainability of the ex-AAP councillor’s petition.

The high court has listed the matter for hearing in September and granted liberty to Hussain’s counsel to file a rejoinder to ED’s reply.

The high court also called for the trial court record by the next date of hearing.

Hussain, represented by senior advocate Maneka Guruswamy, has sought quashing of the Enforcement Case Information Report, ED’s version of an FIR, lodged in March 2020 under sections 3 (offence of money laundering) and 4 (punishment for the offence on money laundering) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

ED’s counsel claimed that earlier, an identical petition was also filed by the accused which has already been dismissed by the high court.

However, the contention was opposed by Hussain’s counsel who stated that the previous petition was a revision plea against an order for framing of charges while the present one is for seeking a direction to quash the ED’s complaint.

On November 24, 2022, the high court has rejected Hussain’s plea challenging framing of money laundering charges against him in the case.

It held there was no infirmity in the trial court order which said a prima facie case was made out against Hussain under the PMLA.

Hussain’s earlier petition challenged the trial court’s November 3, 2022 order by which charges for the alleged offence under Sections 3 and 4 of the PMLA were framed against him.

According to the ED’s complaint, Hussain “fraudulently” withdrew money from the bank accounts of companies owned or controlled by him through the bogus entry operators on the strength of fake bills.

The ED complaint alleged, Hussain was the ultimate beneficiary of the laundered money and the funds obtained through criminal conspiracy were put to use during the riots in February 2020.

Delhi Police have registered 3 FIRs against Hussain and others under various sections of the IPCs in connection with the riots.

Based on the FIRs, inquiries were initiated and the ED registered an ECIR against him on March 9, 2020.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago