Delhi High Court

Co-Producer of ‘Animal’ Movie Seeks Delhi HC Stay on its OTT Release

Cine 1 Studios, a co-producer of the Bollywood film ‘Animal,’ has approached the Delhi High Court, seeking a stay on its release on Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms, digital streaming platforms, and its satellite broadcast. The movie, directed by Sandeep Reddy Vanga, premiered in theaters on December 1, 2023, and is scheduled to be released on Netflix, an OTT platform, on January 26, 2024.

Cine 1 Studios Pvt Ltd alleges a breach of agreement, claiming that it has not received any payment. On the other hand, the defendant and co-producer, Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd, contends that Rs 2.6 crore was paid to the plaintiff, which was not disclosed to the court.

Justice Sanjeev Narula examined the document presented by the defendant regarding the payment of Rs 2.6 crore to the plaintiff. When questioned about the claimed payment, the counsel for Cine 1 Studios expressed unawareness as the document was not brought to his notice. The lawyer assured the court that he would consult with his client and provide the necessary information.

The court was informed that the plaintiff’s counsel would ensure the presence of the authorized signatory of Cine 1 Studios, Murad Khetani, before it on January 18, the next date of the hearing.

Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi, representing Cine 1 Studios, argued that the plaintiff had not received information about the film’s revenue, box office collections, music, or rights for satellite or internet distribution. He claimed that Super Cassettes had collected all the money but failed to pay any amount to Cine 1 Studios, despite the profit-sharing agreement.

The plaintiff’s complaint stated that the two production houses had entered into an agreement to produce the film. According to Cine 1, it had a 35 per cent profit share and was entitled to 35 per cent intellectual property rights under the agreement.

The complaint alleged that Super Cassettes incurred expenses and received revenues without Cine 1’s approval, violating the profit-sharing agreement. It also claimed that Super Cassettes did not pay any money to the plaintiff.

Senior advocate Amit Sibal, representing Super Cassettes, countered that the plaintiff had not invested any money in the film, and all expenses were covered by his client. He informed the judge of a document signed between the parties, asserting that the plaintiff had relinquished all its intellectual property rights in the film on August 2, 2022, for a consideration of Rs 2.6 crore.

Sibal contended that this critical information was concealed from the court in the amended agreement, where the clause granting 35 per cent of intellectual property rights was deleted.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago