Delhi High Court

“Decide In 3 Months Representation To Ban Dangerous Dog Breeds”: Delhi HC To Centre

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday has asked the Centre to decide expeditiously, preferably within 3 months, a representation to ban and cancel the licence to keep “dangerous” dog breeds such as Pitbull, Terriers, American Bulldog and Rottweiler.

A bench headed by the Acting Chief Justice Manmohan asked the petitioner, who made the representation in October, to let the authorities “take a call” on the issue as they were the ones who draft the relevant laws & regulations.

During the hearing, the court stressed the need for promoting the local breeds of dogs which are “sturdy”.

The court observed, “Indian breeds need to be taken care of. They are far more sturdy. They don’t fall sick that often because they have acclimatized. Today we are vocal for local.”

The central government lawyer stated that the representation has already been sent to the concerned department and a decision will be taken after consultation with stakeholders.

The bench, also comprising Justice Mini Pushkanra, ordered, “they (the authorities) shall decide representation as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 3 months.”

On October 5, a division-bench headed by then Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma refused to entertain the petitioner’s PIL on the issue, stating that they should first approach the government authorities with its grievance.

In its petition, Legal Attorneys & Barristers Law Firm alleged that dog breeds like Bulldog, Rottweiler, Pitbull, Terriers, Neapolitan Mastiff are “dangerous dogs” and are banned in more than 12 countries including India but the Municipal Corporation of Delhi was still registering them to be kept as pets.

The petition highlighted that there had been many incidents of such dog breeds attacking people including their owners.

It stated, “lt is the need of the hour to ban and cancel the licence to keep dogs such as Pitbull, Terriers, American bulldog, Rottweiler, Japanese Tosa, Bandog, Neapolitan Mastiff, Wolf Dog, Boerboel, Presa Canario, Fila Brasileiro, Tosa Inu, Cane Corso, Dogo Argentino and cross breeds of above-mentioned dogs.”

The petition asserted that it was the duty of the Centre and the state government to act as welfare state and to take preemptive action to save the lives of the citizens from the risk of any major dog bite incident by these “dangerous” breeds.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

12 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

12 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

13 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

13 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

14 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

14 hours ago