Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Directs Centre To Address Penal Provision For Unnatural Sex In BNS

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Centre to consider a public interest litigation as a formal representation concerning the removal of penal provisions for unnatural sex and sodomy from the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, which replaced the Indian Penal Code.

The bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gelela, instructed the Central government to address the representation promptly, ideally within six months. The court dismissed the PIL but allowed the petitioner to return to court if there is undue delay in the government’s response.

The PIL, filed by lawyer Gantavya Gulati, sought to address a “legal lacuna” created by the BNS, which has repealed Section 377 of the IPC. This section previously criminalized non-consensual unnatural sex, including acts involving minors and bestiality.

Central government counsel Anurag Ahluwalia informed the court that the issue is under review and requires a comprehensive approach. The court expressed concern over potential legal gaps, noting that if an offence occurs now, there might be no adequate legal remedy under the current statutes.

The bench emphasized the urgency of the matter, suggesting that if necessary, an ordinance could be considered to fill the legal void. They highlighted the need for immediate action, given the significant impact on vulnerable communities, including the LGBTQ community.

The petitioner argued that the BNS’s lack of provisions equivalent to Section 377 leaves a critical gap in legal protection, particularly affecting LGBTQ individuals. They requested provisional revival of the criminalization of non-consensual sexual acts as previously defined in Section 377 until the petition is resolved.

The plea also urged the Centre to amend the BNS to include explicit provisions criminalizing non-consensual unnatural sexual acts.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago