Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Directs JNU to Provide Interim Accommodation to Visually Impaired Student

The Delhi High Court has directed the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) to allow a visually impaired student, who was evicted from the hostel, to stay in a guest house on the campus without charging any money for the time being.

A bench of Justice Hari Shankar passed the order after the student’s counsel informed that he was provided interim accommodation by JNU in compliance with the court’s earlier order but was being charged Rs 100 per day, which was beyond his financial means. The lawyer stated that the student is 100 percent blind.

The Court granted a final opportunity of 10 days to the university to file a response to the petition challenging the eviction of Sanjeev Kumar Mishra from the hostel on the ground that the applicable rules do not permit hostel accommodation to a student pursuing a second postgraduate course.

Advocate Rahul Bajaj, representing the petitioner, argued that this rule cannot be universally applied without considering the physical disabilities individual students may have. He mentioned that the petitioner was sleeping on library benches and had no place to stay during the day.

On January 4, the court had issued notice to JNU, asking it to file a response within a week. However, neither a response was filed nor any lawyer appeared for the authorities during the hearing on January 22. JNU’s counsel had submitted on January 4 that if the petitioner had no place to stay, the university would be willing to offer him some accommodation until the next date of hearing. The court clarified that this interim arrangement was only to ensure that the petitioner was not subjected to continued hardship and would be subject to the outcome of his petition.

On January 22, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that JNU was charging Rs 100 per day from Mishra for the room provided on the campus. The court then directed the university to “permit the petitioner to stay in the room till the next date of hearing without charging him any fees.” The matter was listed for further hearing and disposal on February 12, with instructions for the parties to file their written submissions.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago