The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition on Monday challenging the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) decision to withdraw ₹2,000 currency notes from circulation.
A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad rejected the plea.
The petitioner, advocate Rajneesh Bhaskar Gupta, argued that the RBI lacked the independent authority, as per the RBI Act, to discontinue banknotes. Gupta claimed that only the Central government possessed the power to take such action, and there was no evidence of any government order to that effect.
It is worth noting that the High Court had previously rejected a plea on May 29 by Ashwini Upadhyay, a leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), challenging the RBI’s decision to exchange these notes without requiring identity proof.
The Court stated that the ₹2,000 notes had fulfilled their purpose and that the withdrawal was a policy matter beyond the court’s interference.
The judgment explicitly mentioned that the government’s decision was not arbitrary, encouraged illegal activities, or facilitated corruption.
Upadhyay subsequently approached the Supreme Court with his plea, which is currently pending. Last month, the Supreme Court declined to expedite the matter for listing.
The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…
The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…
Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…
The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…
The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…