Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Emphasizes Importance of Clarity in Medicine Labeling

The Delhi High Court recently emphasizes the importance of clarity in labeling medicines and the need to avoid any potential confusion.

The Court made the observation while hearing a suit filed by Mankind Pharma seeking a permanent injunction against Novakind BioSciences from using the term ‘Kind’ in their medicinal and pharmaceutical products.

Justice C Hari Shankar highlighted that assessing the deceptive similarity between different medicines should be done from the perspective of an average-intelligence customer with imperfect recollection. The judge also acknowledged the unfortunate reality of poorly designed pharmacies run by unqualified individuals in India.

“The little apothecary, oftentimes not even able to flaunt a medical degree, occupying the little cubbyhole at the street corner, dispensing medicines, is an unfortunate reality in this country,” the order reads.

These establishments sometimes prescribe medicines based on their manufacturer, particularly for those who can’t afford more upscale medical services.

On April 21, 2021, the Court issued an ex parte interim injunction against Novakind. This year, Novakind applied to lift the interim injunction, arguing that Mankind lacked registration for the ‘Kind’ mark and couldn’t claim exclusive control over it. However, the Court highlighted that Mankind had registration for the ‘Mankind’ mark in all classes. The similarity in phonetics and deceptive nature of ‘Mankind’ and ‘Novakind’ led the Court to reject Novakind’s argument.

“The ‘KIND’ suffix not being endemic to pharmaceutical preparations, there is every likelihood of a customer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, who chances across the defendant’s ‘NOVAKIND’ product, to believe it to be one of the KIND family of the marks belonging to the plaintiff,” the bench stated.

The single bench emphasized that this likelihood of association constitutes trademark infringement. The Court wasn’t convinced by Novakind’s claim that medicines are prescribed by knowledgeable individuals. Even a physician or chemist could be confused due to the common ‘Kind’ suffix. The Court stressed that medicines, particularly prescription drugs, must be clearly distinguishable to avoid any confusion.

Consequently, the Court upheld the interim injunction and dismissed Novakind’s application.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

2 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

2 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

2 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

3 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

3 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

3 hours ago