Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Flashing, Directs Counselling For Minor Victim

The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a 63-year-old man accused of flashing at a minor girl and directed that the 10-year-old alleged victim be counselled as such incidents leave a “deep trauma”.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday granted bail to a 63-year-old man who was accused of flashing at a minor girl.
Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma said the accused was an old man and was stated to be mentally unstable.

The court also directed that the alleged 10-year-old victim should undergo counselling due to the deep trauma caused by such incidents.

The judge also noted the man had not touched the girl nor verbally abused her.

The court stated in a recent order, “There is no doubt that such incidents leave a deep trauma on the victim but at the same time, the Court has to strive to maintain a balance…Without going into the merits of the case and taking into account the age of the accused and that he has no past criminal antecedents, the accused is admitted to Court bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.”

The court stated, adding an NGO may be involved in counselling, “The IO (investigating officer) is directed to get the counselling session organized for the victim.”

Currently, an FIR has been registered under section 509 (Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of IPC and section 12 (Punishment for sexual harassment) of the POCSO Act against the petitioner accused who was arrested on June 24, 2023, and was in judicial custody ever since.

On the morning of June 23, the victim alleged that she was sitting near the staircase of her house when the petitioner, who lives in the same neighborhood, showed his private parts to her and uttered something.

According to the victim’s school records, she was born in June 2013, as confirmed by the court.

In the order, the court directed the petitioner to not directly or indirectly make any threat etc or to any person acquainted with the case and, in case any complaint is received by the police, he shall shift his residence to a location beyond a 5 km radius from the victim’s family home.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago