Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Imposes ₹20 Lakh Damages on Websites for Unauthorized ‘Brahmastra’ Streaming

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court recently emphasized that piracy of cinematograph films stands as a significant contributor to losses within the movie industry.

The court held several websites accountable for damages amounting to ₹20 lakhs due to their illegal streaming of the film “Brahmastra Part One: Shiva.”

A bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh passed a permanent injunction against at least 338 websites for infringing upon the copyrights held by Star India Private Limited regarding the film featuring Ranbir Kapoor and Alia Bhatt. It’s worth noting that an interim injunction had been previously imposed on some of these websites.

The lawsuit underscored the proliferation of websites, particularly when it comes to popular copyrighted content, which has become a concerning norm. Furthermore, the court pointed out that despite the authorities implementing various orders in this case, the identities of the individuals or entities behind these infringing websites often remained anonymous, and in some instances, only known to Domain Name Registrars.

The court also acknowledged recent amendments to the Cinematograph Act of 1952 aimed at taking a more stringent stance against piracy. “Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 2023 has been enacted and notified on 4th August, 2023, to curb the menace of film piracy,” it stated.

Initially, Star India had filed the lawsuit against just 18 websites. However, the interim injunction was later extended to include numerous other rogue and mirror websites. The court was informed that the defendants persisted in infringing upon the content and, in an attempt to circumvent court orders, established mirror or redirect websites for domains that had already been blocked by the authorities.

Considering the substantial number of websites engaged in streaming or copyright infringement, the court decreed that the defendants would collectively and severally be liable to pay ₹20,00,000 in damages to the plaintiff.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Kerala HC Refuses To Grant Relief To Lawyer Accused Of Raping Minor

The Kerala High Court has denied anticipatory bail to Noushad, a lawyer accused of sexually…

3 days ago

Supreme Court to Hear Petitions on Rohingya Refugees’ Deportation and Living Conditions on May 8

The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing on May 8 for a set of petitions…

3 days ago

Advocates’ Association of Bengaluru to Address Judicial Corruption in Special Meeting

The Advocates' Association of Bengaluru (AAB) has called for a special general body meeting on…

3 days ago

Terror Funding Case: Delhi Court Junks Engineer Rashid’s Bail Plea

A Delhi court on Friday rejected the bail application of Lok Sabha MP from Jammu…

3 days ago

Bombay High Court Quashes Sexual Harassment Findings Against Bank Employee

The Bombay High Court has overturned an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) report and a subsequent…

3 days ago

Honey-Trap Scandal: Opposition BJP Members Stage Dharna In K’taka Legislative Assembly Seeking Judicial Probe

The members of the opposition BJP on Friday staged a protest in the Karnataka Legislative…

4 days ago