Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Imposes ₹20 Lakh Damages on Websites for Unauthorized ‘Brahmastra’ Streaming

The Delhi High Court recently emphasized that piracy of cinematograph films stands as a significant contributor to losses within the movie industry.

The court held several websites accountable for damages amounting to ₹20 lakhs due to their illegal streaming of the film “Brahmastra Part One: Shiva.”

A bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh passed a permanent injunction against at least 338 websites for infringing upon the copyrights held by Star India Private Limited regarding the film featuring Ranbir Kapoor and Alia Bhatt. It’s worth noting that an interim injunction had been previously imposed on some of these websites.

The lawsuit underscored the proliferation of websites, particularly when it comes to popular copyrighted content, which has become a concerning norm. Furthermore, the court pointed out that despite the authorities implementing various orders in this case, the identities of the individuals or entities behind these infringing websites often remained anonymous, and in some instances, only known to Domain Name Registrars.

The court also acknowledged recent amendments to the Cinematograph Act of 1952 aimed at taking a more stringent stance against piracy. “Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 2023 has been enacted and notified on 4th August, 2023, to curb the menace of film piracy,” it stated.

Initially, Star India had filed the lawsuit against just 18 websites. However, the interim injunction was later extended to include numerous other rogue and mirror websites. The court was informed that the defendants persisted in infringing upon the content and, in an attempt to circumvent court orders, established mirror or redirect websites for domains that had already been blocked by the authorities.

Considering the substantial number of websites engaged in streaming or copyright infringement, the court decreed that the defendants would collectively and severally be liable to pay ₹20,00,000 in damages to the plaintiff.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago