Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Issues Notices to Social Media Handles on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s Defamation Plea

The Delhi High Court has issued notices to several YouTube channels and social media handles based on a plea filed by senior advocate and BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia, alleging defamatory statements against him concerning an incident at a Noida court where he was reportedly manhandled.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna declined to issue an ex-parte order without hearing the other parties involved in the matter. The high court issued notices to 13 defendant YouTube channels and X handles regarding the application for interim relief to remove the offending content. It also issued summons for the defamation suit and scheduled the hearing for April 8.

Notices were also issued to X (formerly Twitter) and Google. During the hearing, the high court remarked that something very unfortunate had occurred and noted that the Supreme Court had equally taken cognizance of the incident.

Represented by advocates Raghav Awasthi and Mukesh Sharma, Bhatia sought direction for the 13 defendants to pay damages exceeding Rs 2 crore for allegedly making defamatory statements against him using X and YouTube platforms. He also requested a permanent injunction against the defendants, restraining them from publishing any defamatory allegations against him.

His lawyers argued that the videos contained baseless allegations despite the true events being recorded in the Supreme Court’s order, which took suo motu cognizance of the incident. They further highlighted that one of the videos justified violence and could potentially incite physical harm against the lawyer.

Awasthi mentioned that some videos alleged Bhatia had gone to the Noida court to represent influencer Elvish Yadav, which they contended was entirely untrue. Bhatia is also a BJP national spokesperson.

On March 21, the Supreme Court took note of the alleged manhandling of Bhatia in the Gautam Buddh Nagar district court on March 20. It directed the concerned district judge to ensure the CCTV footage of the incident was safely preserved pending further orders and ordered a report to be submitted on the incident.

The apex court expressed concern that a strike by members of the bar affected the litigants, who are crucial stakeholders in the justice system. The Supreme Court Bar Association also condemned the misconduct of a lawyer in the district court against Bhatia.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

14 hours ago

Allahabad HC Turns Down Appeal Seeking Appointment Of Receiver For Jaigurudev Sanstha

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…

14 hours ago

Shivaji Statue Collapse Case: Bombay HC Grants Bail To Consultant Chetan Patil

The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…

14 hours ago

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Refuses To Stay Trial Against Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…

15 hours ago

AP Assembly Passes Resolution To Set Up HC Bench In Kurnool

The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…

15 hours ago

Lesbian Couple Desiring Child Gets Bail In Kidnapping Of Minor Girl

The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…

16 hours ago