Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Issues Show Cause Notice To Man For ‘Whimsical’ Allegations Against A HC Judge

The Delhi High Court on Friday has issued a show cause notice to a man and asked why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him for levelling “unsubstantiated and whimsical” allegations against a high court judge and comparing her to a devil.

A bench comprising of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula stated the allegations by the appellant Naresh Sharma are distasteful and unacceptable and these averments are prima facie aimed at scandalizing and lowering the authority of the court.

The division bench stated in an August 31 order which was released on September 6, “In our opinion, the statements have been advanced with the malafide intention to interfere with the administration of justice. This court cannot disregard vilification of this magnitude against a judge of this court. There is fine line of distinction which separates critique from allegations fueled by disdain and a hostile intent to scandalize the court.”

The bench added, “The pleadings in the present appeal amount to the latter category and must be taken cognisance of.”

The “objectionable and shocking” allegations were made by Sharma against a single judge of the high court in his appeal challenging a judgment delivered by the judge on his petition in July.

The single judge rejected his plea for a probe into alleged corruption by the government since independence.
The division bench stated that he could not render an explanation for the averments made in the appeal.

It stated, “The present appeal contains unsubstantiated and whimsical allegations of criminal acts by learned single judge seeking the punishment of death penalty and a comparison of the judge to the devil, which is distasteful and unacceptable.”

The bench said, “Considering the above, let notice be issued to the appellant, that is, Naresh Sharma, Punjab, to show-cause as to why proceedings for criminal contempt under Section 2(c) read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, should not be initiated against him. The notice shall indicate that, the appellant, shall file a reply to the show-cause notice, on or before the next date of hearing,” and listed the matter for further hearing on September 18.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

11 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

11 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

12 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

12 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

13 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

13 hours ago