Delhi High Court

Delhi HC: PIL Seeks Legal Education Commission Creation

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Delhi High Court, which seeks from the central government the establishment of a Legal Education Commission, a body similar to the Medical Education Commission, which shall comprise retired judges, law professors, and lawyers to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a four-year Bachelor of Law (LLB) course.

Petitioner’s Argument

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, a practicing lawyer, contends that there should be an expert committee formed by the Bar Council of India (BCI) to assess the alignment of the existing five-year LLB course with the new education policy of 2020.

The PIL criticizes the length and structure of the current five-year LLB program, arguing that it is excessive and irrelevant to legal education. It suggests that this discourages students from pursuing law as a career and instead opting for fields like engineering or civil services.

EXISTING SYSTEM’S COMPARISION WITH THE HYPOTHETICAL PLAN

The PIL draws a comparison between law and other courses. The PIL says a BTech degree obtained through IIT requires four years of focused education in a specific engineering discipline, without unnecessary elements. In contrast, pursuing a BA-LLB or BBA-LLB degree through institutions like NLU and affiliated colleges demands five years of a student’s time, imparting knowledge in areas such as arts and commerce that are unrelated and deemed excessive.

The proposed expert committee would be tasked with preparing a report on the necessity of completing a BA, BBA, or BCom degree before pursuing an LLB, which is currently a graduation course.

The plea emphasizes that the yearly expenses for a five-year LLB program exceed those of a hypothetical four-year course, thereby imposing a heavier financial strain on students.

In essence, the PIL urges a thorough reassessment of India’s LLB education system, advocating for reforms that emphasize relevance, efficiency, and accessibility. It points out that if the voting age can be lowered and if distinguished advocates like Jethmalani could start their legal careers at 17, bypassing extensive formal education, then a condensed four-year LLB program would be better suited to today’s generation.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Vanuatu Awaits Court Verdict On Lalit Modi’s Citizenship Cancellation

Vanuatu has revoked the passport it granted to former IPL chairman Lalit Modi, who faces…

17 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Actress Ranya Rao Sent To Judicial Custody Till March 24

The Economic Offences Court in Bengaluru on Monday remanded Kannada actress Ranya Rao to judicial…

17 hours ago

SC Opens Doors For Visually Impaired Candidates In Judiciary; Legal Fraternity Hails Move As Step Towards Inclusivity

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired…

17 hours ago

Delhi Court Turns Down Plea For Custody Parole Sought By MP Rashid Engineer

The Patiala House Court on Monday denied the plea of Jammu and Kashmir MP Rashid…

18 hours ago

“Anti-Conversion Laws Are Anti-Choice, Personal Choice Made Public, Dalits Forced To Defend Personal Choices”: Retd Judge Muralidhar

Senior Advocate and former Orissa High Court Chief Justice, Dr. S Muralidhar, recently spoke against…

18 hours ago

Calcutta HC’s Justice Joymalya Bagchi Appointed As The Supreme Court Judge

The Central Government has approved the appointment of Calcutta High Court Judge, Justice Joymalya Bagchi,…

19 hours ago