Delhi HC Pulls Up Police Officer For Intimidating Lawyers; Seeks Written Apology

Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court came down heavily on a police officer accused of misbehaving with lawyers inside the court premises, remarking that he is “supposed to be a protector of law and not a predator.”

Justice Arun Monga heard Rameshwar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi when the incident involving Sub-Inspector Narinder from Okhla Industrial Area police station was brought to his attention.

Officer Accused Of Threatening Lawyers

According to submissions before the bench, SI Narinder allegedly abused and threatened not only the counsel representing the appellant and the complainant but also a senior counsel who attempted to intervene.

The court noted that his conduct was unacceptable and contrary to the principles of law enforcement.

“Such misconduct on the part of SI Narinder cannot be countenanced under any circumstances. He cannot turn his khaki to the level of such arrogance that he misbehaved with the officers of this Court who are doing the honourable duty of assisting the Court in discharge of justice, but also threatened them with dire consequences merely because he thinks he is above law,” Justice Monga observed.

Court’s Observations

The court highlighted the seriousness of the officer’s behavior, stressing that law enforcement officers are expected to uphold dignity and fairness, particularly within judicial premises.

Initially, the bench considered directing the registration of an FIR against the officer for his conduct. However, it refrained from issuing such an order after SI Narinder tendered an unconditional apology in court.

Apology Must Be In Writing

Justice Monga clarified that a verbal apology would not suffice in light of the seriousness of the misconduct. The officer was directed to submit a written affidavit acknowledging his actions.

“However, I am of the view that, looking at the conduct of SI Narinder, the apology be submitted in writing by way of an affidavit. The needful be done by tomorrow,” the court directed.

Judicial Warning

While the court exercised restraint by not ordering immediate criminal proceedings, the strong remarks serve as a stern warning against any abuse of authority by law enforcement personnel.