Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Rejects DTC Appeal Against Reinstatement of Deceased Bus Conductor

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court has declined to intervene in the reinstatement order of a deceased DTC bus conductor who was terminated from service in 1991 due to unauthorized absence for 15 days.

The court deemed the punishment of removal as “shockingly disproportionate” and noted that even if the matter were reconsidered for the quantum of penalty, it would serve no purpose as the conductor was no longer alive.

A bench comprising former Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula dismissed the appeal by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), challenging a single-judge order that upheld a 2003 labor court award directing the conductor’s reinstatement with back wages.

The deceased employee faced removal from service in January 1992 after an inquiry was initiated against him by the DTC. He filed a case against his dismissal under industrial disputes law, but he passed away during the legal proceedings.

The bench observed that during the inquiry, only one witness was examined, and the inquiry officer disbelieved the conductor’s statement that he was compelled to take a 15-day leave due to illness, and his leave application was sent through his brother. The court further noted that the medical certificates were ignored only because the treatment was in a private hospital, and the fact-finding by the Labor Court was not perverse.

The court stated, “Not only this, in the considered opinion of this Court, for an absence of 15 days, the punishment of removal is shockingly disproportionate, and therefore, on this count alone, the workman was entitled to relief.”

It emphasized the unfortunate aspect of the case, highlighting that the workman is no longer alive. Even if the matter were remanded back to the Labor Court on the point of quantum of punishment, it would serve no purpose as the workman is deceased.

The court was informed that the DTC has paid all the terminal dues to the deceased conductor’s wife and legal heirs and implemented the award of reinstatement. Consequently, the court found no reason to interfere with the Labor Court’s award and the single-judge order, given the circumstances. The appeal was dismissed accordingly.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

16 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

16 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

16 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

17 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

17 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

19 hours ago