Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Rejects PIL Seeking Virtual Elections Campaigning for Jailed Politicians

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on Wednesday, which sought direction to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to immediately develop a mechanism allowing jailed political leaders and candidates to campaign virtually with reasonable restrictions.

The Bench

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, remarked that such a move could potentially allow dreaded criminals like Dawood Ibrahim to form political parties and campaign through video conferencing, stating that even rapists and murderers might exploit this avenue. Additionally, the bench, including noted awareness of the propaganda behind such petitions and their recent experience with frivolous pleas, wherein costs were imposed on petitioners.

Who filed the PIL?

The PIL, filed by Law Student Amarjeet Gupta, highlighted a representation sent on April 2, 2024, urging the respondents to cease arresting Chief Ministers, Party Leaders, Cabinet Ministers, and Candidates (for both Lok Sabha and Assembly Constituencies) post the declaration of the Model Code of Conduct. It also requested the establishment of a mechanism to eliminate the necessity for enforcement agencies to seek permission from the Election Commission of India for arrests.

Furthermore, it sought immediate notification to the Election Commission of India regarding arrests deemed urgent for national security, such as offenses under the UAPA.

Moreover, the plea urged compliance with the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) Office Memorandum (OM) dated December 1, 2011, reiterated in the OM dated March 15, 2021, directing all government officials, including the respondents, to acknowledge and respond to communications from the public.

Recently, the High Court dismissed several PILs related to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), imposing costs on petitioners. The court emphasized Kejriwal’s access to legal remedies and the equality of law, underscoring the lack of substance in the petitioners’ claims.

Arrests

Kejriwal was arrested on March 21 by the ED in connection with an excise policy case, with the ED alleging the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) as the primary beneficiary of the proceeds of crime generated in the alleged liquor scam.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

1 day ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

1 day ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

1 day ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago