Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Rejects Plea Of Sukesh Chandrashekhar For Transfer From Mandoli Jail

The Delhi High Court has dismissed alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s plea challenging his potential transfer from Mandoli Jail to another prison.

The court stated, “We do not find any necessity for issuing directions for not transferring the petitioner to other jails if so necessitated for administrative reasons.”

Sukesh had requested that jail officials be instructed not to transfer him from Jail No. 13 in Mandoli, citing Rule 667(1) of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. He also sought a four-day advance notice before any such transfer. In his plea, Sukesh argued that he suffers from multiple health issues, including gallbladder stones, requiring treatment at Safdarjung Hospital and RML Hospital. He claimed that a transfer would disrupt his ongoing medical care.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, in a recent ruling, noted that Sukesh has been treated for his ailments at external hospitals as needed. The court acknowledged that he is undergoing psychiatric treatment for anxiety and his condition is currently stable. Importantly, the court pointed out that Central Jail, Tihar, also offers psychiatric facilities.

The court emphasized that any directives affecting jail administration should only be issued in cases of compelling need or evidence of bad faith on the part of the jail administration. No such grounds were evident in Sukesh’s case, especially since he had previously filed a writ petition requesting the transfer of a specific official from Jail No. 13.

Given that the necessary medical treatments can be provided at other jail facilities, the court found no justification for preventing Sukesh’s transfer for administrative reasons. However, it ordered that he must receive a 3-days notice before any transfer.

In related developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) recently recorded Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s statement concerning an alleged extortion racket operating within Delhi’s prisons. Following the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi’s approval, the CBI initiated a preliminary inquiry into Sukesh’s claims regarding this extortion racket.

In 2021, he was accused of extorting ₹200 crores from the wife of an industrialist through a series of calls, intensifying the seriousness of the case.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Directs Assam State Legal Services Authority To Conduct Surprise Visits At Matia Transit Camp

The Supreme Court on Friday has directed the Assam State Legal Services Authority to conduct…

42 mins ago

SC Criticizes Delhi LG’s “Tearing Hurry” To Conduct MCD Standing Committee Election

The Supreme Court expressed concern on Friday regarding the "tearing hurry" displayed by the Lieutenant…

46 mins ago

‘Tirupati Laddu’ Row: Madras HC Directs FSSAI To Issue Supplementary Notice To AR Dairy Food

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards…

56 mins ago

“Right To Live With Dignity Extends Even To Incarcerated”: SC

The Supreme Court has made a landmark ruling, emphasizing that the "right to live with…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Scraps Of Bhavik Koladiya Suit Against Ashneer Grover After Settlement

The Delhi High Court on Friday disposed of a lawsuit filed by BharatPe founder Bhavik…

3 hours ago

“PIL Seeking Registration Of FIR Against Vineet Goyal To Be Heard On Monday”: Cal HC

The Calcutta High Court announced on Friday that it will hear a public interest litigation…

3 hours ago