Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Rejects Plea Seeking ‘Transparency’ in Supreme Court Collegium

The Delhi High Court has dismissed with costs of Rs 25,000 a petition seeking detailed reasons from the Supreme Court collegium when rejecting recommendations for high court judges’ appointments.

Rakesh Kumar Gupta, the petitioner, also sought directions for the collegium to disclose the qualifications considered for such appointments and to publish monthly data on pending and disposed recommendations.

‘Complete Waste of Judicial Time’

Justice Subramonium Prasad stated that the court cannot scrutinize the subjective satisfaction of the Supreme Court’s collegium and deemed the petition a “complete waste of judicial time”.

The court ordered, “This court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition imposing costs of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner to be deposited with the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund within a period of four weeks from today. The writ petition is dismissed along with pending application(s), if any.”

Petitioner’s Argument

Gupta, who alleged being affected by a delay in his case pending in the Rohini district court, highlighted the high rejection rate of collegium recommendations as “extremely disturbing”, suggesting a communication gap between the apex court and the high courts on appointment criteria. He pointed out that the rejection rate was about 35.29 per cent in 2023 compared to 4.38 per cent in 2021.

The court rebuffed Gupta’s claims, stating he lacked locus and failed to justify how he was affected, dismissing his plea as merely a publicity interest litigation. It noted that the Supreme Court collegium’s decision outcomes were publicly available on the court’s website and the qualifications for high court judges were defined under Article 217 of the Constitution.

“The Collegium of the Hon’ble Apex Court evaluates numerous factors before accepting high court collegium recommendations. This court cannot review the subjective satisfaction of the Collegium of the Hon’ble apex court,” the court concluded.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago