Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Rejects Plea Seeking ‘Transparency’ in Supreme Court Collegium

The Delhi High Court has dismissed with costs of Rs 25,000 a petition seeking detailed reasons from the Supreme Court collegium when rejecting recommendations for high court judges’ appointments.

Rakesh Kumar Gupta, the petitioner, also sought directions for the collegium to disclose the qualifications considered for such appointments and to publish monthly data on pending and disposed recommendations.

‘Complete Waste of Judicial Time’

Justice Subramonium Prasad stated that the court cannot scrutinize the subjective satisfaction of the Supreme Court’s collegium and deemed the petition a “complete waste of judicial time”.

The court ordered, “This court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition imposing costs of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner to be deposited with the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund within a period of four weeks from today. The writ petition is dismissed along with pending application(s), if any.”

Petitioner’s Argument

Gupta, who alleged being affected by a delay in his case pending in the Rohini district court, highlighted the high rejection rate of collegium recommendations as “extremely disturbing”, suggesting a communication gap between the apex court and the high courts on appointment criteria. He pointed out that the rejection rate was about 35.29 per cent in 2023 compared to 4.38 per cent in 2021.

The court rebuffed Gupta’s claims, stating he lacked locus and failed to justify how he was affected, dismissing his plea as merely a publicity interest litigation. It noted that the Supreme Court collegium’s decision outcomes were publicly available on the court’s website and the qualifications for high court judges were defined under Article 217 of the Constitution.

“The Collegium of the Hon’ble Apex Court evaluates numerous factors before accepting high court collegium recommendations. This court cannot review the subjective satisfaction of the Collegium of the Hon’ble apex court,” the court concluded.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago