Delhi HC Rejects To Order Public Access To CIC Hearings, Cites Infrastructure Issues

Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to issue directions permitting journalists and the general public to attend Central Information Commission hearings, either physically or through virtual means, citing logistical and infrastructural challenges.

A division bench of Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Anish Dayal heard the plea filed by a group of journalists advocating for greater transparency and public access to CIC proceedings.

Infrastructure Constraints A Major Barrier

While the court acknowledged the broader merit of open and accessible hearings, it emphasized that enabling public or live virtual access would require substantial technological planning and significant financial investment.

“Though we support the spirit of openness, implementing such access—especially through live streaming or virtual attendance—demands extensive infrastructure that is currently not in place,” the bench observed.

Petitioners Directed To Approach CIC

Rather than issuing direct orders, the High Court advised the petitioners to approach the CIC itself for physical access to proceedings, noting that the Commission already has an internal mechanism in place for such requests.

The court also asked the CIC to consider the matter promptly and respond in accordance with legal protocols.

Supreme Court Already Examining Virtual Access

On the broader question of enabling virtual public access to tribunal and commission hearings, the bench pointed out that the issue is already pending before the Supreme Court.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the government, confirmed that the top court is actively considering legal frameworks around public participation in virtual hearings.

Background

The plea before the High Court had urged that CIC proceedings—where matters related to the Right to Information are adjudicated—should be made open to public scrutiny, arguing that transparency is fundamental to a robust democratic system. The petitioners also called for media access to promote accountability in governance.

However, the High Court, while sympathetic to the petitioners’ concerns, opted not to interfere at this stage, emphasizing that systemic upgrades are required before such access can be implemented.