Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Reserves Verdict on Congress Party’s Plea against ITAT Order

The Delhi High Court reserved its verdict on Tuesday on a plea filed by the Indian National Congress party against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) rejecting its application for a stay on the demand notice issued by the Income Tax (IT) department for the recovery of more than ₹105 crore in outstanding taxes.

Justices Yashwant Varma and Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav reserved the verdict while noting that there appears to be no fundamental infirmity in the ITAT order.

The division bench remarked that the proceedings against the party had commenced in 2021 and criticized the lack of action from the Congress party, stating, “Someone in petitioner’s office has remained asleep since 2021.”

The bench hinted that the judgment would be delivered on Wednesday.

Senior Advocate Vivek Tankha, appearing for the Congress, expressed concern over the freezing of the party’s accounts, stating that continued freezing would lead to the collapse of the party, particularly with the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

However, the Bench countered Tankha’s arguments, stating that the situation had arisen in 2021 and that mere recent awareness in February 2024 would not change the circumstances.

Advocate Zoheb Hossain, representing the IT department, argued against the notion that the proceedings were timed with the elections, asserting that the process had been ongoing since 2021.

Hossain highlighted that with interest, the total demand against the Congress party amounted to ₹135 crore, of which ₹65.9 crore had already been recovered.

The ITAT had earlier ruled, in a March 8, 2024 order, that the IT authorities were justified in denying the income tax exemption claimed by the Congress, citing the party’s failure to establish a strong prima facie case.

The IT authorities had initially rejected the Congress’s nil income declaration and demanded over ₹105 crore in tax, citing late filing and donations exceeding the prescribed limit.

Controversy arose in February 2024 when the Congress claimed that its bank accounts were frozen, leading to the party challenging the proceedings before the ITAT.

The Department of Revenue of the Ministry of Finance clarified to the ITAT that it had not ordered freezing the Congress’s accounts but had only placed a lien on the amount corresponding to the outstanding tax demand.

The ITAT, in its detailed judgment, stated that the Congress was required to file its income tax return by the due date.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago