Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Rules Rejection Of Colour Vision-Deficient Applicants For Delhi Police Posts

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court have recently ruled that individuals with defective colour vision can’t be appointed as constables in the Delhi Police.

The decision, delivered by a bench comprising Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Amit Sharma, upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s stance that defective colour vision constitutes a medical defect rendering candidates unfit for the role.

“There can be no cavil with the finding of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that defective colour vision is a defect. As such, the petitioners clearly suffer from a defect which renders them unfit for appointment as constables in the Delhi Police,” the bench stated.

The court emphasized the need for higher medical fitness standards for candidates applying to police and similar forces compared to civilian posts.

It highlighted that rigorous medical criteria are essential to ensure that personnel are fully capable of performing the demanding duties expected of them.

The petitioners had approached the High Court after CAT refused to entertain their application for appointment in the Delhi Police.

Their counsel argued that “defective colour vision” is distinct from “colour blindness” and should not disqualify them from being appointed as constables.

However, Central Government Standing Counsel Ashish Dixit, representing the Delhi Police, opposed the petition, asserting that defective colour vision is a recognized medical defect. He argued that the recruitment advertisement explicitly required candidates to be free from such defects, leaving no room for exceptions.

After reviewing the submissions, the bench concluded that the CAT’s ruling required no intervention.

“We do not find any cause to interfere with the judgment of the Tribunal. This writ petition accordingly stands dismissed in limine,” the court declared.

This decision underscores the stringent medical requirements for police recruits and reaffirms the importance of ensuring that candidates meet the prescribed physical and medical standards. By dismissing the petition, the High Court has reinforced the view that any compromise on these standards could hinder the effective functioning of law enforcement personnel.

The judgment not only clarifies the legal position on defective colour vision for police recruits but also serves as a reminder of the critical role medical fitness plays in maintaining operational readiness in the police force.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

1 day ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

1 day ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

1 day ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

1 day ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

1 day ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

1 day ago