Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Seeks Centre’s Response on Wrestlers’ Plea Against WFI Elections

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought responses from the Centre and the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) on Monday regarding a petition filed by wrestlers Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and her husband Satyawart Kadian. The petition seeks to declare the December 2023 elections held by the sports body as illegal and to set them aside.

A bench of Justice Sachin Datta issued notices to the Central government, WFI, and the Ad-Hoc Committee of WFI on the petition. The court granted time to the Central government’s standing counsel Anil Soni to obtain instructions in the matter and listed the plea for further hearing on March 7, 2024.

The wrestlers, represented by senior advocate Rahul Mehra, were prominent figures in last year’s protest at Jantar Mantar, demanding the arrest of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh for alleged sexual harassment of seven women grapplers. Senior advocate Dayan Krishnan represented the WFI.

The plea argued that the WFI elections, conducted on December 21, 2023, violated the Sports Code and sought a directive for the federation to “cease and desist” from any wrestling-related activities.

Sanjay Kumar Singh, a close associate of Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, was elected as the new president of the WFI during the election.

“The petitioner prays the court may be pleased to set aside and declare the elections held by R2/WFI on December 21, 2023, as illegal and void ab-initio since the same has been held in blatant violation of the sports code,” the petition stated.

The petitioners accused the WFI of various wrongdoings, including conducting selection trials against the directives of the ad-hoc Committee for Wrestling Federation of India.

It alleged that the WFI attempted to silence and sideline them, affecting their chances of participating in international events.

The plea sought a direction for the ad-hoc committee to continue managing the day-to-day affairs of the WFI or, alternatively, to appoint a retired Supreme Court judge as an administrator to take over the body’s affairs.

It further claimed that the WFI has been a “habitual offender” as it repeatedly flouted directions from the Sports Ministry and the ad-hoc committee, negatively impacting the career prospects of Indian wrestlers.”

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

5 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

5 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

5 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

5 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

6 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

6 hours ago