Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Seeks NIA’s Response On PFI Leader Puthanathani’s Bail Plea

The Delhi High Court on Monday has issued a notice to the National Investigation Agency regarding the bail application of Ibrahim Puthanathani, the former national coordinator of the Popular Front of India.

Puthanathani has been in custody for 2 years, following his arrest in 2022.

The division bench, comprising Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Amit Sharma, requested a response from the NIA within two weeks. The next hearing is scheduled for November 11.

During the proceedings, advocate Kartik Venu, representing Puthanathani, appeared via video conference. He highlighted that his client has been in custody for an extended period and noted that an earlier bail application had been denied by the trial court at Patiala House in New Delhi.

Puthanathani’s detention stems from allegations of his involvement in a terror case, with charges filed under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in April 2022.

The NIA’s case alleges that Puthanathani and other PFI leaders conspired to raise funds for terrorist activities and were reportedly involved in operating terror camps.

Following the central government’s decision to ban the PFI under UAPA on September 28, 2022, the NIA conducted a nationwide crackdown, resulting in the arrest of several PFI leaders.

In June 2023, Puthanathani was granted a brief custody parole of six hours. However, the significant time spent in detention has raised concerns about the duration and conditions of his custody, prompting his legal team to seek bail once more.

The outcome of this bail application will be closely monitored, given the ongoing scrutiny of organizations labeled as terrorist entities by the government. As the legal proceedings unfold, they will likely have implications for the PFI and its members, as well as broader discussions about civil liberties and anti-terrorism laws in India.

With the next hearing approaching, the NIA’s response will be pivotal in determining whether Puthanathani will be granted bail or remain in custody while awaiting trial. The court’s decision will not only affect the individual case of Puthanathani but could also influence the legal landscape surrounding similar cases in the future.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Atul Subhash Case: Wife, Relatives File Anticipatory Bail Pleas In Allahabad HC

Engineer Atul Subhash’s estranged wife, Nikita Singhania, along with her family members, has filed anticipatory…

2 days ago

Koregaon Bhima Battle Anniversary Planning: BHC Allows Maharashtra Govt To Enter ‘Jay Stambh’ Plot

The Bombay High Court has recently granted the Maharashtra government permission to access the disputed…

2 days ago

Mahakumbh: NGT Extends Deadline For Sewage Management Plan

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has recently granted the Uttar Pradesh government additional time to…

2 days ago

US Appeals Court Turns Down TikTok’s Request To Delay Ban

A federal appeals court has recently rejected TikTok’s request to delay a law requiring the…

2 days ago

Delhi Court Sends Naresh Balyan To Judicial Custody, Denies Police Further Remand

A Delhi court on Friday sent AAP’s Uttam Nagar MLA Naresh Balyan to judicial custody…

2 days ago

Telugu Film Writer Defends Allu Arjun, Calls His Arrest ‘Fabricated’ Case

Actor Allu Arjun’s lawyer, Ashok Reddy, criticized the delay in his client’s release despite the…

2 days ago