Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Sets Aside OCI Card Cancellation of Professor Ashok Swain

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Monday set aside the Central government’s decision to cancel the Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card of Professor Ashok Swain, an Indian-origin professor based in Sweden.

A single bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad noted that the government’s order invoked Section 7D(e) of the Citizenship Act without providing any specific reasons for revoking Swain’s OCI status.

The Court determined that the decision lacked thoughtful consideration, prompting the directive for the Central government to issue a fresh order with proper reasoning within a three-week period.

“The respondents are directed to pass a detailed order giving reasons for the cancellation of petitioner’s OCI card. The impugned order is set aside the respondents are directed to complete the exercise in three weeks. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case,” the bench stated.

Ashok Swain, a renowned academic and professor specializing in peace and conflict research at Uppsala University in Sweden, has approached the High Court, asserting that his Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card was revoked in February 2022 due to his critical remarks about the present Indian government.

During the court proceedings, the representative for the Central government stated that Swain’s OCI card was canceled because his activities were deemed “prejudicial to the security and stability of India,” as well as its “sovereignty and integrity,” and “friendly relations with other countries.”

Contrarily, Swain maintained that he had not made any inflammatory speeches and that there were no specific instances or evidence to substantiate the allegations against him.

“It is submitted that the petitioner has never engaged in any inflammatory speeches or Anti-India activities. As a scholar, it his role in the society to discuss and critique the policies of Government through his work,” the plea contended.

“Being an Academician, he analyses and criticises certain policies of the present government, mere criticism of the policies of the current ruling dispensation shall not tantamount to anti-India activities under Section 7D(e) of the Citizenship Act, 1955,” it added.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Justice Yashwant Varma Denies Allegations Of Cash Found At Residence, Probe Panel Formed

Allegations surrounding a fire at the residence of Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma,…

22 minutes ago

Delhi Court Dismissed BJP MP Raju Bista’s Defamation Complaint Against MLA Bishnu Sharma

The Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday declined to take cognizance of a defamation complaint filed…

48 minutes ago

Gold Smuggling Scandal: Actress Ranya Rao’s Lawyer Challenges DRI’s Search Consent at Bail Hearing

Actress Ranya Rao, who was caught allegedly smuggling 14.2 kg of gold at Kempegowda International…

1 hour ago

Delhi High Court Allows Withdrawal of PIL Against Yo Yo Honey Singh’s ‘Maniac’ Song

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday permitted the withdrawal of a Public Interest Litigation that…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Allows Engineer Rashid To Attend Parliament Sessions

The Delhi High Court has granted permission to Engineer Rashid, an independent Member of Parliament…

2 hours ago

Kunal Kamra Row: Mumbai Police To Issue 2nd Summons In ‘Traitor’ Joke Case Today

The Mumbai Police on Wednesday are preparing to issue a second summon to stand-up comedian…

3 hours ago