Delhi High Court

Delhi HC Sets August 1 For Hearing Kirti Azad’s DDCA Reform Plea

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Monday has scheduled a hearing for August 1 on former cricketer Kirti Azad’s petition.

Azad is seeking judicial directions to appoint an administrator for the Delhi & District Cricket Association (DDCA) and to recast the DDCA’s electoral roll to adhere to a “one family, one vote” system, followed by fresh elections.

Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain set the date for consideration but Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, representing Azad, requested that the matter be transferred to a Division Bench, arguing that it has the nature of a public interest litigation.

Previously, the court had asked all respondents to provide their responses to the petition. Azad’s plea calls for a more transparent and fair membership system at the DDCA, including a clear waiting list of applicants to replace the current ad-hoc membership process. The petition also demands that only those who pay their Club Subscription Fees on time be allowed to vote in elections.

Azad claims that the existing membership process lacks clear guidelines and is subject to arbitrary decisions by DDCA officials. He alleges that memberships are often strategically given to selected individuals and their families, creating a family monopoly. This has led to officials placing their relatives in various official positions within the DDCA and even enrolling their staff as members. The petition also alleges issues with bogus voting and irregular membership verification.

According to Azad, these practices contribute to corruption and nepotism in team selections, affecting the Delhi team’s performance in various cricket tournaments such as the Vijay Merchant Trophy, Vinoo Mankad Trophy, and Ranji Trophy. He argues that the team’s poor performance is a direct result of the corrupt selection process.

To address these issues, Azad is calling for the introduction of a new, fair membership system and a restriction on voting to one vote per family. This, he argues, would prevent the entrenchment of a few families in positions of power and eliminate the current monopoly within the DDCA.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Madras HC Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To Comedian Kunal Kamra

The Madras High Court on Friday granted stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra interim transit anticipatory bail…

12 hours ago

“Restaurants Can’t Force Customers To Pay Service Charge”: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Friday ruled that payment of service charge by customers at…

12 hours ago

Delhi HC Orders Engineer Rashid To Deposit Over ₹3.35 Lakh To Attend Parliament

The Delhi High Court on Friday directed Jammu and Kashmir Member of Parliament (MP), Abdul…

12 hours ago

Kerala HC Dissolves Petitions Seeking Probe Against CM Pinarayi Vijayan And His Daughter

The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed 2 petitions seeking an investigation into allegations of…

13 hours ago

Supreme Court Sets Aside Plea For FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma, Says Inquiry Ongoing

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma,…

15 hours ago

Staff Appointment Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Gives AIIMS Bhopal ‘Last Chance’ To Respond

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday issued a “last chance” to the All Indian…

15 hours ago