Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court’s Insight on Viksit Bharat Yatra

The Delhi High Court questioned whether using the term “Viksit Bharat” (developed India) in the government’s “Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra” scheme is problematic, noting that all political parties commonly use such slogans. The court, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, highlighted that the term simply refers to a developed India.

It emphasized that aspiring to make India great is a common slogan used by leaders across parties. The court’s remarks came during the hearing of EAS Sarma & Anr v Union of India.

Here’s what happened:

  • The court addressed concerns over alleged government resource misuse in promoting “Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra.”
  • Petitioner’s advocate argued that “Viksit Bharat” is a BJP slogan, suggesting partisan use.
  • Central government’s counsel countered, claiming the scheme is non-partisan and benefits the public.
  • Counsel Sharma cited data showing yatra’s extensive reach, covering thousands of villages and millions of beneficiaries.
  • He emphasized the importance of feedback from the yatra in assessing performance across regions.
  • The yatra has covered 34 states and Union Territories, informing over 11.94 crore attendees about government schemes.
  • The Bench adjourned the case to May 21 after hearing part of the argument.
  • The PIL alleges misuse of public resources and civil servants for the yatra, challenging the Ministry of Defence’s selfie directive featuring PM Modi.
  • Central government argues that yatras provide essential connectivity to remote areas lacking government scheme benefits.
  • The High Court notes during the PIL hearing that as long as there’s no political promotion, promoting government schemes is acceptable, emphasizing the Prime Minister’s constitutional position justifying public fund use.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago