Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Orders Removal of False Allegations Against Rajat Sharma

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court has ordered Congress leaders Jairam Ramesh, Pawan Khera, and Ragini Nayak to delete their social media posts wherein they claim that veteran journalist Rajat Sharma had used offensive language during his show on the day of the Lok Sabha election results.

Facts of the Case

The controversy began when Nayak accused Sharma of verbally abusing her on national television during a debate on the counting day of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. Sharma’s lawyer highlighted that although the debate aired on the evening of June 4, when the election results were declared, the Congress leaders only started posting tweets about it on June 10 and 11. Senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Sharma, argued that a manipulated clip of the show was being circulated with an inserted abusive remark, whereas the original footage did not contain any such language.

Court’s Order

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna stated that upon reviewing the footage of the TV debate presented in court, it was prima facie clear that plaintiff Sharma had only briefly intervened for a few seconds and had not used any abusive language against Nayak. The court emphasized that while public criticism and alleged defamatory posts, tweets, and YouTube videos on intermediary platforms face a higher threshold of scrutiny, individuals’ dignity and honor should not be tarnished under the guise of exercising free speech and expression. The posts criticizing the plaintiff are merely exaggerations and portrayals of facts that are blatantly untrue, the court held.
The court ordered that the posts or tweets referred to as “X,” which have not yet been removed, must be taken down by the defendants within seven days, in accordance with the Intermediary Guidelines. Additionally, it directed that videos currently accessible to the public must be made private and should not be made public again without further orders from the court.
FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare
AddThis Website Tools
Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Shahi Idgah Dispute: Allahabad HC Seeks Muslim Side Response On Plea

The Allahabad High Court, on Wednesday, sought a response from the Muslim side concerning a…

13 hours ago

Corbett Illegal Construction: SC Raps U’khand For Acting Against Top Officers At ‘Snail’s Pace’

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday expressed strong disapproval of the Uttarakhand government's "snail's…

14 hours ago

Delhi High Court Stays BFI’s March 7 Circular On Election Representation

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday temporarily stayed the Boxing Federation of India's March 7…

14 hours ago

Migrant Workers’ Case: SC Raises Concerns Over Ration Card Misuse, Warns They Have Turned Into ‘Popularity Cards’

Ration cards are now being used as 'popularity cards,' said Justice Surya Kant, in an…

15 hours ago

“F-1 Visa: How Students Can Stay Compliant & Avoid Deportation”

The Trump administration's recent escalation of immigration enforcement, particularly targeting foreign nationals associated with pro-Palestinian…

15 hours ago

Delhi HC Seeks Centre Response After PIL Demands Closure Of Abattoirs Near IGI Airport

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Central government regarding a…

16 hours ago