Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Rejects PIL on PM Modi’s 2024 Election Disqualification

A public interest litigation sought the disqualification of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from the 2024 Lok Sabha elections on the grounds that he allegedly violated the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) by allegedly soliciting votes in the name of religion or a place of worship during a speech in Pilibhit, Uttar Pradesh. Through this petition, petitioner Advocate Anand S. Jondhale also sought a direction to be issued to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to disqualify PM Modi from elections for six years under the Representation of People Act.

This petition was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, and the reason cited for its disqualification is that the plea was devoid of merit.

THE JUDGEMENT

The court further stated that this plea was “thoroughly misconceived.” The reason stated was that the complainant in this case had filed a complaint before the Election Commission of India, wherein he had filed a complaint on similar grounds. Even before the Election Commission of India could address his complaint, there was no reason to move the court to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction by moving to this court. Secondly, the prayer presupposes that there has been a violation of the Model Code of Conduct and compendium of instructions. This presupposition is completely unjustified.

The High Court stated that it is not within its authority to instruct the Election Commission of India (ECI) to adopt a specific stance regarding the petitioner’s complaint or any other complaint. Additionally, the court emphasized that issuing decisive directives, as requested by Jondhale, is not permissible.

CONCLUDING NOTES

Justice Datta further said that “the ECI is obliged to take an independent view on the petitioner’s complaint, and the petitioner, if aggrieved, shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedy in accordance with law.”

And the attorney appearing on behalf of the Election Commission of India assured the court that the complaint will be “duly processed” and “appropriate orders will be passed thereon.”.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

2 days ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

2 days ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

2 days ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

2 days ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

2 days ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

4 days ago