Delhi High Court

Disengaged Delhi Assembly Research Centre Fellows Moves HC Seeking Reinstatement

Disengaged Delhi Assembly Research Centre fellows approached the Delhi High Court on Thursday, urging it to reinstate its earlier direction for the continuation of their services.

These professionals had previously challenged the termination of their services and are now seeking payment for the period they have already served.

A bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad asked the respondent authorities – the Legislative Assembly Secretariat, Finance Department, and Services Department – to provide their stand and instructed their counsel to seek instructions.

Last month, the court had vacated its interim direction for the continuation of the fellows’ services, stating that after the Supreme Court declined to stay the terminations, propriety demanded that the high court should not have issued the interim order. The counsel for the petitioners argued that the Supreme Court had clarified that the issue was never considered, and the interim order should be reinstated. The court directed that the matter be listed for hearing next week.

On September 21, the court had directed that the services of the terminated fellows with the Delhi Assembly Research Centre should continue until December 6, and stipends would be paid to them. The services of these fellows were terminated prematurely, and they argued that this was done in an arbitrary and illegal manner. They claimed that the discontinuation of their services and non-payment of stipends violated their fundamental rights and constituted a “colourable exercise of power.”

The fellows asserted that the interference by the services and finance departments violated the doctrine of separation of powers since the Delhi Assembly Research Centre operates under the aegis of the legislative assembly and the speaker. They contended that their services could not be terminated in the manner they were, and that the Delhi legislative assembly and the city government were bound by their promise to engage the petitioners as per the terms of their service.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago