“Growing Tendency” To Make Grave Allegations For Winning Matrimonial Battles: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court in a recent judgement stated “strongly deprecated” the use of children as tools in the criminal justice system to harass and intimidate the other party, while noting the “growing tendency” of making grave allegations to win matrimonial battles.

The court made observations while quashing a case under the POCSO Act against a father on the basis of a settlement with the complainant’s mother and his estranged wife.

Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma observed that, the dispute arose due to matrimonial discord between the parties, which resulted in 2 FIRs against the husband for mental and physical harassment, cruelty, dowry demand etc, and inappropriately touching the private part of his daughter.

In view of the settlement between the parties following a mutual divorce, the court ruled that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the cases when the complainant did not wish to pursue them and the POCSO case was stated to have been lodged on account of a “misunderstanding”.

It directed the father, a lawyer, to take up 10 pro bono cases, “This court acknowledges the growing tendency in parties alleging grave allegations on one another merely to win matrimonial battles and strongly deprecates the practice of children being used as an instrument to set the criminal justice in motion solely to harass or intimidate the other party. Be that as it may, this Court under 482 CrPC has the inherent jurisdiction to quash any criminal proceedings in order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of the process of the court,” said the court in a recent order.

However, since the cases placed a “burden on the criminal justice system.”

The court stated, Secretary, Delhi State Legal Service Committee is requested to assign 10 cases which the petitioner shall do pro bono.

In the order, the court stated that the children born out of wedlock would be free to pursue their legal rights in accordance with the law.

Also, it was said that the Supreme Court as well as the high court has ruled that cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.