Categories: Delhi High Court

If Two Views Possible In Cases Seeking Reversal Of Acquittal, View Favoring Accused Should Be Adopted: SC

The Supreme Court on Friday held that in cases of reversal of acquittal, where two possible outcomes exist, the view that favors the accused has to be adopted.

A division bench of Justice Krishna Murari and Justice BV Nagarathna was hearing a petition filed by Roopwanti against the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had acquitted the respondents-accused whom she alleged killed her son.

The bench stated that in such cases courts must keep in mind that the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused would stand strengthened and fortified and the prosecution will have an even greater responsibility to reverse the presumption.

“In cases where a reversal of acquittal is sought, the courts must keep in mind that the presumption of innocence in favour of the accused, on grounds of it surviving the rigours of a full trial, is strengthened and stands fortified. The prosecution then, while still working under the same burden of proof, is required to discharge a more onerous responsibility to annul and reverse the fortified presumption of innocence. This fortification of the presumption of innocence has been held in a catena of judgments by this court,” the bench stated.

Background: On December 22, 2009, the six respondents-accused attacked the victim, who passed away the next day from his injuries.

Against the respondents, a first information report (FIR) was filed.

The trial court deemed the prosecution’s case to be questionable because no eyewitnesses were able to support it throughout the trial, and as a result, all of the respondents were declared not guilty.

Furthermore, the trial court noted that the appellant, who is the deceased’s mother, provided a completely different account of events than the prosecution witness.

The High Court also dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the trial court’s acquittal decision was based on proper assessment of evidence and facts and there was no error.

The appellant then filed an appeal with the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court stated that when acquittal is reversed, the courts must keep in mind that the presumption of innocence in favour of the accused is strengthened and fortified because it has survived the rigours of a full trial.

As a result, the prosecution is required to discharge a more onerous responsibility to annul and reverse such presumption of innocence, the Court stated 

The Court also cited its decisions in Allarakha K Mansuri v. State of Gujarat (2002) and Mrinal Das and Others v. State of Tripura (2011) in this regard.

In light of the foregoing, the Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the trial court made no mistakes and thoroughly examined all evidence.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Allahabad HC Transfers 12 District Judge-Level Officials

In a significant judicial reshuffle, the Allahabad High Court administration on Friday transferred 12 judicial…

38 minutes ago

‘Eradicate Sanatan Dharma’ Remark: SC Defers Hearing Plea Of Udhayanidhi Stalin

The Supreme Court on Friday deferred the hearing on Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's plea…

51 minutes ago

2013 Rape Case: SC Notices Gujarat Govt On Asaram’s Plea Seeking Sentence Suspension

The Supreme Court on Friday sought a response from the Gujarat government regarding self-styled godman…

1 hour ago

SC Issues Notice On Manish Sisodia Plea Seeking Relaxation Of Bail Conditions

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to the Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement…

2 hours ago

SC Stays Disqualification Of 6 CPS In HP Govt

The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily halted the disqualification process of 6 Chief Parliamentary Secretaries…

2 hours ago

A.R. Rahman, Saira Banu’s Lawyer Vandana Shah Reveals Reasons For Divorce

Renowned music composer A.R. Rahman and his wife, Saira Banu, recently announced their separation after…

2 hours ago