Kailash Gahlot Withdraws Plea From Delhi High Court Against Centre’s Clearance For Foreign Visits

A petition challenging the denial of travel permission to former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for the World Cities’ Summit has been withdrawn.

The petition had accused central authorities of abusing their discretion in granting travel clearances, arguing that such arbitrary decisions negatively impact urban governance and national interests.

The case brought attention to concerns over the selective approval process for official travel by ministers. Supporters of the petition claimed that restricting international visits based on political considerations undermines effective governance and collaboration on global issues.

The denial of Kejriwal’s request was seen as part of a larger pattern of travel restrictions imposed on opposition leaders, raising questions about fairness and transparency in government decision-making.

However, in a significant political development, Kailash Gahlot, who was involved in the petition, withdrew it after resigning as Delhi’s Transport Minister and joining the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). His decision to switch parties highlights the ongoing tensions between the state and central governments regarding ministerial autonomy in travel and governance matters.

The move also underscores the shifting political landscape in Delhi, with opposition leaders facing increasing challenges in securing approvals for foreign visits. While central authorities argue that travel permissions are granted based on national interests and administrative priorities, critics view these restrictions as a tool to curb opposition voices and limit their participation in international forums.

Gahlot’s withdrawal of the petition marks the end of this particular legal challenge, but the broader debate over travel clearances for opposition leaders is far from over. The issue remains a point of contention, with implications for federal governance, bureaucratic control, and political strategy in India’s evolving political climate.

As political shifts continue, the question of whether ministerial travel permissions should be handled with greater transparency and consistency remains crucial for ensuring fair governance and international representation.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International