The Delhi High Court has advocated for a legal approach that prioritizes contextual understanding over punitive action in cases involving consensual adolescent relationships.
Acknowledging that such relationships are an inherent aspect of human development, Justice Jasmeet Singh underscored the necessity for legal frameworks that differentiate between exploitative conduct and voluntary emotional bonds.
In a judgment issued on January 30 and released publicly on February 14, Justice Singh asserted that legal provisions must adapt to recognize and respect relationships formed on mutual consent, provided they are devoid of coercion or abuse.
The court highlighted that the objective of child protection laws should be to prevent exploitation rather than criminalize consensual adolescent relationships.
“Love is an essential element of human experience, and adolescents should have the right to form meaningful emotional connections. Legal interpretations must evolve to acknowledge such relationships, so long as they are characterized by mutual consent and the absence of coercion,” the judgment stated.
The High Court upheld a trial court’s decision acquitting a man accused of penetrative sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The case originated from a December 2014 complaint filed by the father of a minor girl who had not returned home after her tuition classes. Suspicion regarding her association with the accused led to a police investigation and subsequent charges.
During the inquiry, law enforcement authorities located the girl, then approximately 16 years old, with the accused. The prosecution argued that the relationship violated the POCSO Act. However, the High Court determined that the prosecution failed to provide conclusive proof establishing the girl’s minor status beyond a reasonable doubt.
Moreover, the court noted that the girl consistently maintained that the relationship was consensual.
Justice Singh cautioned against rigid adherence to age-based legal thresholds, emphasizing the need for contextual analysis. “Where the minor is unwavering in her assertion of consent and comprehension, it would be unjust for the judiciary to disregard her agency solely on the basis of statutory age limitations,” the court observed.
The ruling underscored the necessity for conclusive evidence when determining age in cases involving serious legal consequences under the POCSO Act. The court further advocated for a legal perspective that harmonizes the rights of young individuals with society’s broader responsibility to ensure their well-being.
“A compassionate approach that emphasizes understanding rather than punitive measures is vital in cases concerning adolescent relationships,” Justice Singh stated. The judgment signifies an increasing judicial recognition of the complexities inherent in adolescent interactions and the need for a more nuanced legal response.
Additionally, medical examinations did not substantiate the prosecution’s claims, particularly in the absence of any physical evidence indicative of non-consensual activity.
The court concluded that judicial decision-making must equitably consider all evidence while preventing the potential for excessive penalization resulting from inflexible statutory interpretations.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International
