Delhi High Court

Lok Sabha Polls: Delhi HC Orders Police Protection for Transgender Nominee

The Delhi High Court has emphasized the State’s duty to uphold and enforce the rights guaranteed to transgender individuals under the Constitution.

This directive came as the court instructed the local police to provide necessary security to a transgender person intending to file nomination for the Lok Sabha polls.

Rajan Singh, the petitioner, aimed to submit his nomination from the South Delhi Parliamentary Constituency with the backing of the Rashtriya Bahujan Congress Party. He alleged a “life-threatening attack” at his Badarpur office earlier this month and sought appropriate security and protection of his fundamental rights.

The Judge

Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta noted that Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees equality, including in the election process, and any discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity violates this provision.

The court’s order on April 29 stated, “Article 14 of the Constitution of India ensures equal protection of laws in all spheres of State activity, including participation in the election process. Any discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity impairs the equality before law and violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The duty lies on the State for the purpose of safeguarding and enforcing the rights of the transgenders guaranteed under the Constitution.”

Delhi Police

The court disposed of the petition with directions to the Deputy Commissioner of Police (South) to provide necessary security to the petitioner for filing the nomination form from South Delhi Parliamentary Constituency. The concerned Station House Officer was also directed to share their mobile number with the petitioner for this purpose.

The State’s counsel assured the court that if the petitioner required security for filling the nomination form, it would be provided. They also pledged to investigate the petitioner’s complaint in accordance with the law and communicate the outcome within two weeks.

During the initial inquiry, it was found that the alleged incident could not be corroborated. The Election Commission’s lawyer informed that the nomination process began on April 29, and the petitioner was free to apply as per the law.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago