‘Minor’s consent is not consent in eyes of law’: Delhi HC denies bail to rape accused

While denying bail to a man accused of raping a 16-year-old girl and changing her Aadhaar card’s date of birth, the Delhi High Court made the observation that assent from a minor is not considered consent in the eyes of the law.

The high court also said the conduct of the man in getting the girl’s date of birth changed on the Aadhaar card was a “serious offence”.

“It seems that the applicant (man) wanted to take advantage by getting the date of birth on the Aadhaar card changed so that when the applicant established physical relationship with the complainant, she was not a minor.

“The consent of the minor at the age of 16 years, specially, when the applicant was 23 years old and already married also disentitles him for grant of bail. Consent of a minor is no consent in the eyes of law,” Justice Jasmeet Singh said in a recent order.

On the girl’s father’s report that his daughter was missing in 2019, a FIR was filed. The girl was later located, saved, and returned from the Sambhal district of Uttar Pradesh.

The girl, who was discovered with the man, said that he was her boyfriend and that they had been together for around one and a half months in her statement to a magistrate.

She further said the man established physical relationships with her consent and that she wanted to stay with him.

The judge said, “In the present case, I am of the view that the girl was merely 16 years on the date of incident. The applicant was 23 years old and was already married. It is stated by… counsel appearing for the complainant (girl) that she has interacted with the complainant and the complainant has informed her that it was the applicant who took her to the office of SDM (subdivisional magistrate) and got her date of birth changed in the Aadhaar card from the year 2002 to March 5, 2000 only for the purpose of showing that the date of the establishing physical relationship she was not a minor.”