Delhi High Court

No Domicile Certificate Needed For Advocate Enrolment; Except Delhi Residents: BCI To Delhi HC

The Bar Council of India (BCI) recently informed the Delhi High Court that, according to the information available to it, only the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) has made domicile in the State mandatory for enrolment of law graduates as advocates.

The BCI stated in an affidavit filed before the High Court that neither the Advocates Act of 1961 nor the Bar Councils of India Rules list domicile in state as a requirement for enrolment with the relevant State Bar Council.

“The persons who may be admitted as Advocate on the State roll is provided for in Section 24 of the Act. It is stated that the only requirement/condition under The Advocates Act, 1961 is that an application for admission as an advocate shall be made to the State bar Council where the applicant proposes to practice under Section 25 of the Act,” the BCI submitted.

It further added,

“…the Bar Council of India vide email dated 10th May 2023 sent communication to all the State Bar Councils asking for response, asking amongst other, to the domicile as requirement for enrollment. That in response, 14 State Bar Councils so far have sent the reply and on going through the same, it transpired that as on date except Bar Council of Delhi, none of the other 13 State Bar Councils have domicile of the Law Graduate/ Applicant as criteria/requirement for enrolment as Advocate.”

In response to two petitions challenging the BCD’s recent decision to require aadhaar and voter identity cards with addresses in Delhi-NCR for enrollment with the BCD, the BCI filed its reply.

By way of a notice dated April 13, the BCD had stated that lawyers wishing to enrol with the BCD would need to present their Aadhaar and voter identification documents proving their residency in Delhi or the NCR.

It also stated that fresh law graduates wishing to enrol in the national capital must attach copies of their Aadhaar and Voter ID cards with an address in Delhi/NCR.

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago