Patiala House Court Reserves Order On ED’s Chargesheet Against Supertech Chairman RK Arora

Patiala House Court on Monday reserved the order on cognizance point on the prosecution complaint (chargesheet) filed by ED against Supertech’s chairman and Promoter RK Arora in connection to a money laundering case.

The Additional Sessions Judge Devender Kumar Jangala decided to keep the order after the conclusion of the arguments made by ED’s Special Public Prosecutors Naveen Kumar Matta and Manish Jain in the matter.

The Court fixed September 26, 2023, for passing of the order.

Meanwhile, Advocate RK Handoo appeared for RK Arora and moved the default bail plea in the matter.

ED has filed a prosecution complaint (chargesheet) against Supertech’s Chairman, RK Arora in relation to a money laundering case in Delhi’s Patiala House Court.

Previously on Jue 27, Arora was arrested under the criminal sections of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Last week, Delhi High Court dismissed the plea moved by Arora challenging grounds of arrest.

In the present case, Court stated the grounds of arrest were duly given and notified to the petitioner and he endorsed the same in writing under his signature. The core issue is of being “informed” and “as soon as”.

The Court stated, it has been duly notified and brought to the notice at the time of arrest and further disclosed in detail in the remand application, it amounts be duly informed and served.

Earlier, ED apprised the court that 26 FIRs were registered by the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi Police; Haryana Police and UP Police against Supertech Limited and its group companies under Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) read with 406(criminal breach of trust)/420 (cheating)/467/471 IPC having allegations of cheating at least 670 home buyers for an amount of Rs 164 crore.

ED also alleged that the amount collected by Supertech Ltd. was diverted to their group companies for the purchase of properties and the company with land having much lesser value.

ED alleged that the accused persons have acquired properties, and made illegal/wrongful gain arising out of the said proceeds of crime by involving, indulging and commissioning criminal activities related to scheduled offences.

It is stated that the prima facie case for commission of an offence punishable under Section 3 punishable under Section 4 of the PML Act has been made.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago